Bindu K.R. vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 12 May, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13589 of 2009(P)


1. BINDU K.R., W/O. UNNIKRISHNAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. R. BINDU, W/O. GOPAKUMAR,
3. SREEKALA C.R., W/O. PONNAPPAN PILLAI,
4. SHYLAJA, W/O. GOVINDA PILLAI,

                        Vs



1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE TAHSILDAR/ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR,

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHOOR

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :12/05/2009

 O R D E R
                        V.GIRI, J
                      -------------------
                 W.P.(C).13589/2009
                     --------------------
        Dated this the 12th day of May, 2009

                      JUDGMENT

Petitioners challenge Ext.P4 order issued by

the RDO requiring the removal of certain rubber

trees planted in their property. I am not inclined to

consider the contentions of the petitioners on merits

at this stage. It is open to the petitioners to move

the RDO for revocation of Ext.P4.

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. I am

of the view that Ext.P4 need only be treated as a

show cause notice. If the petitioners file an objection

against Ext.P4, RDO shall consider the same and

pass a reasoned order within four weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of such objection.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.GIRI,
Judge

mrcs