IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA.No. 2339 of 2009()
1. M.PRAKASH, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Petitioner
2. B.BABURAJ, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. R.SOMAN, S.I.POLICE,
Vs
1. T.M.VARGHESE, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
... Respondent
2. REJO P.JOSEPH, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. V.A.NISHADMON, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
4. V.A.ULLAS, INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
5. A.M.SIDDIQUE, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
6. P.V.RAMESH, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
7. R.MANOJKUMAR, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
8. V.A.KRISHNADAS, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF
9. SUNNY CHACKO, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
10. K.C.BABU, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
11. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
12. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
13. THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE
For Petitioner :SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.)
For Respondent :SRI.K.JAJU BABU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Dated :09/12/2009
O R D E R
KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
------------------------------------------------
W.A.No.2339 of 2009
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2009
JUDGMENT
Kurian Joseph, J.
The appellants are not parties to the
judgment in W.P.(C)No.26066/09. The appellants
approached this court apprehending that the
judgment in the said writ petition would stand
in the way of their promotions being considered.
2. After hearing the counsel on both
sides and learned Government Pleader, this court
had on 4.11.2009, issued the following order:
“Notice. It is made clear that the
judgment shall not stand in the way of
the vacancies available in the post of
Circle Inspector of Police being filled
up on the basis of the existing seniority
list of Sub Inspector of Police.
However, it should be made clear in the
order that the said promotion is
provisions and is subject to the outcome
of the decision taken by the Government
in the appeals. There will be a
direction to the Government to pass
orders on the appeals on or before
31.12.2009.”
W.A.No.2339 of 2009
:: 2 ::
In view of the said order, no further
orders are necessary. The writ appeal is
disposed of in terms of the said order. It is
made clear that this court has not considered
the various contentions raised by the parties
and all the contentions are left open.
Sd/-
(KURIAN JOSEPH)
JUDGE
Sd/-
(C.T.RAVIKUMAR)
JUDGE
SK/-
//true copy//
P.S. to Judge.