IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.34251 of 2010
KAMAL YADAV @ KAMAL PRASAD YADAV
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 17.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody
since 13.04.2010 in a case registered under
Sections 147, 148, 364, 342, 323, 427, 307, 448,
It is alleged that F.I.R. named accused
Ram Chandra Ram alongwith others forcibly took
the brother and mother of the informant on the
Motor Cycle subsequently they got released. The
mother subsequently did not name the petitioner.
It is submitted by the learned counsel
for the petitioner that the petitioner is
involved in two other cases in which the
petitioner is on bail.
It is submitted by the learned counsel
for the petitioner that the petitioner and
informant known to each other as both residents
of same police station and the petitioner’s name
sprang up on confession of accused Ram Chandra
Ram.
2
Considering the fact that the specific
allegation in the F.I.R. is only against Ram
Chandra Ram and one of the victim has not named
the petitioner, let the petitioner above named
be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned C.J.M., Supaul, in connection with
Marauna P.S. Case No. 04 of 2010, G.R. No. 122
of 2010.
U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)