High Court Kerala High Court

S.Unnikrishnan vs The Manager on 4 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
S.Unnikrishnan vs The Manager on 4 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13788 of 2008(N)


1. S.UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.SUKUMARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE,

3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :04/07/2008

 O R D E R
                             S. Siri Jagan, J.
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                      W. P (C) No. 13788 of 2008
               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                    Dated this, the 4th  July, 2008.

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner challenges proceedings under the Securitisation

and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002 initiated by the respondents for recovery of

defaulted loan amounts due from the petitioner to the respondents.

2. Originally, I had granted a stay on condition that the

petitioner pays an amount of Rs. 50,000/- within one month. That

amount was paid. However, I refused to extend the stay further in

view of the averments in the counter affidavit filed by the

respondents. Counsel for the petitioner now confines his prayer for a

direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3

expeditiously and to stay further coercive proceedings till orders are

thus passed.

3. I have heard the learned standing counsel for the Bank, who

stoutly opposes the prayer. Quoting from the statement, he would

submit that the petitioner has not come before this Court with clean

hands and therefore the petitioner is not entitled to any reliefs. Of

course, the petitioner has filed a reply affidavit denying these

allegations. Counsel for the Bank also submits that the Bank has

already taken possession of the security interest. Whatever that be, I

dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 as expeditiously as possible, at

any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. Till orders are passed on Ext. P3, further proceedings

pursuant to Exts. P1 and P2 shall be kept in abeyance.

The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment

W.P.C. No. 13788/2008. -: 2 :-

along with a copy of the writ petition to the 3rd respondent for

compliance.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/