High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Prabha Devi vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 6 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Prabha Devi vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 6 July, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CWJC No.10247 of 2010

                   PRABHA DEVI WIFE OF LATE VISHWANATH
                   DUBEY RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - GARIB
                   ASHTHAN,   P.S. NAGAR,  DISTRICT  -
                   MUZUFFARPUR.

                                            Versus

                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                   2.   THE    COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY,
                   ROAD TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF
                   BIHAR, PATNA.
                   3. THE BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
                   CORPORATION THROUGH            ITS CHAIRMAN,
                   PARIWAHAN BHAWAN BIR CHAND PATEL MARG,
                   PATNA.
                   4. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ROAD
                   TRANSPORT      CORPORATION,        PARIWAHAN
                   BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL ROAD, PATNA.
                   5. THE KARYA PRABANDHAK (ADMINISTRATOR)
                   BIHAR RAJYA PATH PARIWAHAN CORPORATION,
                   PATNA.
                   6. THE KARYA PRABANDHAK, REGIONAL
                   WORKSHOP BELA MUZUFFARPUR, DISTRICT -
                   MUZUFFARPUR.
                   7.   THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER (HEAD
                   QUARTER)    BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
                   CORPORATION, PARIWAHAN BHAWAN, PATNA
                                         -----------

02. 06.07.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is

permitted to add the Chief Accounts Officer (Head Quarter)

Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pariwahan Bhawan,

Patna.

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State and

the respondent – Corporation.

The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband

retired on 31st of December 2002 from the post of Driver

under the respondent – Corporation and later on died on 2nd

of March 2008, retiral dues of the petitioner have not been
2

settled as yet despite representation filed by the petitioner as

contained in Annexure- 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-

Corporation submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be

considered without delay as per law.

In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending

claims, petitioner proposes to file fresh representation before

the respondent no. 7.

In such view of the matter, in case such

representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the

petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the

certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the

relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above

respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised

in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously,

preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such

representation.

Upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the

claims is found not payable, the same shall be informed to the

petitioner with the reasons thereof. The order passed on such

representation shall be communicated to the petitioner by

post under registered cover.

The writ application stands disposed of with the

above observations/directions.

Jagdish/                            ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)