Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr.Saidurrehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2010

Central Information Commission
Mr.Saidurrehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2010
                                     Central Information Commission

                                                                                                       CIC/AD/C/2010/000616
                                                                                                     Dated :  August 19, 2010



Name of the Applicant                                        :     Shri  Saidur Rahman


Name of the Public Authority                                 :     Northern Railway, Lucknow 

                                                      
Background

1. The RTI application was filed by the Applicant on 10.11.09 with the PIO, Northern Railway, Lucknow 

requesting   for   information   against  5  points  including  documents  as  also  opinions  of  the  PIO  on 

various  issues.    The  PIO  provided an interim reply on 10.12.09 informing the Applicant that the 

application ha d been transferred   to the Sr. Div. Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Lucknow to 

provide information against points 1, 2 & 3 and with regard to point 4 information is being collected 

and would be sent soon.  On not receiving any further information, the Applicant filed his first appeal 

on 8.1.10, once again seeking information.  The PIO replied on 12.2.10 requesting the Appellant to 

inspect   the   files   against   points   1­4.     Not  satisfied  with  this  reply,  the  Appellant  approached  the 

Commission with a complaint on 1.4.10 requesting for the missing information against points 1 to 3.

2. The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing for August 19, 

2010.

3. Shri Prakash, PIO & Shri Neeraj Gupta, deemed PIO represented the Public Authority and were 

heard through video conferencing.

4. The Applicant was present during the hearing.

Decision

5. During   the   hearing   the   Complainant   sought   information   against   points   1   to   3.   However,   the 

Commission on perusal of the information sought against these points observed that the Complainant 

is simply seeking the opinion of the PIO and not any information as defined in Section 2(f) of the  RTI 

Act.     With   regard   to   points   4   &   5   the   Respondent   submitted   that   the   letter   as   sought   by   the 

Complainant   could   not   be   located  in   the   file.     The  Commission   directs   the   PIO  to   confirm  this 
information about the non availability of the letter  to the Complainant in writing by 20 th September, 

2010.

6. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

 (Annapurna Dixit)
Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy 

(G.Subramanian)
Deputy Registrar

Cc:

1. Shri Saidur Rahman
R/o Running Shed Colony
L.D.14 A, Terhi Pulia
Alam Bagh
Lucknow 226005

2. The PIO
Northern Railway
Divisional Railway Manager’s Office
Lucknow Division
Hazaratganj

3. The Appellate Authority
Northern Railway
Divisional Railway Manager’s Office
Lucknow Division
Hazaratganj

4. Officer Incharge, NIC