Sri Karethimmaiah vs Sri Yashodhara on 7 January, 2009

11: um I-non comrr or XARNATAKA, %  T7 *   ,
DATED THIS THE own my opaautmey      

BEFORE   _   _
'rm I-IOIIPBLE MR.JUS"HCE H;1§:;}$,AGa§uIsE§3E£AiET  k

 

fifififlflfll

mica mczAsm%%Bv;;ens my *  

1

W10 
AGED 79%a.-mns.% a   

mwmm  

%   '  w/0 k1.m*3k%1*;m'PA1¢1¢A,
 5'9 ¥BARS.% 123$! DYAGEREHALLI,

 ~GO_WBAG.ERE.1-EOBLI,

 *3/o Lam mm .
'~  *A(:}ED 44 mass.

 QRIERANHA,
 j   sic mm mm .
% % % AGED 44 Yams.

/Nmvf"

H9}!-I VNVLVNHVX :10 LHI103 $49!!-I V)lV.i.VN8V)| £0 .¥.}lflO3 HSIH V)lV3.VN3V)i :10 1.3003 R91!-I V)W.l.VNfiV3l J0 ntnrn un

! VXVLVNIIVX JO RIROD



- -.n m....-....w.. uwwm.-a-wa -mmmavmzwmm mmww mumm W??"'MMRM"a%Tfla'!€M'M§@H 513:3

  %  kgmm 59 mans

 ViLLAG- acownmnm HOBIJ,
 % ;;s1RA*rALUK-572 137

%   2

5 $1?! RANGANNA,
Si 0 mm
AGE!) 32 YEARS.

6 smnmnmn.     L _ x   %
29YEAR8, RIO MA VH4LAGE,  , " '
eowmenm mam.   % %  

SIRA 'mLUx- 572 137.  

A1mLLa1rr's1,3, 4&5,amE    
RIO UJJANAKUN'I'E        
G%GEm PDBLI, -   1  
MATALUK,  

mama    

gmrma  34 12.5.1510. 154-/2005 on his ms or    
 (8R.DH.,) sum, mswssma   map  =
AGAINST THE JUDGLEHT  DE*!3REE« . D"sTED 

21.02.2005 mama IN 0.S.fi0.349['».19£}3..?JN..T'HE 

ovum CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DH.,) &     % %

m Apps-1 ' m an   the

This   the mag
and daemon   1993 passed
by me   am'-'c at am and the
 the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn..) Sim

  fiar 

  _ %    are the pxasmma and mponamm
 before the trial Court. In this judmm.

 the parthu m msrmaa tn their sum.
 the trial Court.

 

:10 JHQOD HDIH VHVLVRXVX :10 .|.l!flO3 RSI!-I VXVLVNHVN :10 1.3003 HSIH V)IV1VN3V)l 30 1HflOd I-ii'A.';>iR VNVLVNNVX :lO .I.2lflO3 Hi

I V)lV.|.VN3V}I



W ém.mwIrms"4w._.>_...> 2.01 non»... om x>uz>«>x>

.  11...: G. $13.41.}?! 1.5.. nocnq 9.. x>xz>q>x> 59:

re yyyy %
d u.L 
S TIE. .

10
For the masons stated above, that: appeal f  A'

W
m
M
..

m
.m
um

w

m$@ 33$… fifiégfi 3 .§§QU xamx ézmfizgag ta? §§§.; c§:. E,:_..:E;,:i.; 1.