IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 37859 of 2009(B)
1. S.SREEJA, W/O.RAJAGOPALAN.K.,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
3. THE MANAGER, NAROKAVU HIGH SCHOOL,
For Petitioner :SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :01/01/2010
O R D E R
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
W.P.(C) No. 37859 of 2009
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Dated this the 1st day of January, 2010
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is working as H.S.A. (Malayalam) in the 3rd respondent
school from 9-1-2007 in a leave vacancy. The 3rd respondent Manager of the
school had filed necessary proceedings for approval of the appointment
from 9-1-2007, but the concerned District Educational Officer rejected the
same, which hence was subjected to challenge by the 3rd respondent, by
filing an appeal before the Deputy Director of Education, Malappuram,
though did not turn to be fruitful. Met with the said circumstances, the 3rd
respondent preferred a revision petition before the 2nd respondent and after
considering the facts and figures, the revision petition was allowed in part,
as per Ext.P1 order, whereby the appointment of the petitioner was
approved with effect from 2-6-2008 to 13-3-2012. Aggrieved by the said
order, to the extent approval has been rejected with effect from 9-1-2007,
the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 revision petition before the 1st
respondent. It is stated that the revision petition is numbered as file
6263/E1/09/G.Edn. The prayer is only to direct the 1st respondent to
consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 within a reasonable time.
W.P.(C) No. 37859/09 2
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the
respondents as well.
3. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the 1st
respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2
revision petition, in accordance with law, of course after giving an
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at
any rate within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this
judgment.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.
mn