High Court Karnataka High Court

Sategouda vs The Land Tribunal Chikodi on 31 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sategouda vs The Land Tribunal Chikodi on 31 January, 2009
Author: V.Gopalagowda And Swamy
§N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKK '   'T '

CIRCUET BENCH AT Q§~IARWAi} V' ff  

QATED THIS THE :3 18? DAY: 01?.&J$xNmi§Y'2{}e9V-..___V '  T

PRESENT  % V V
THE HQNBLE MR.JUS'}%i"€;§:v\'._VGOVPP;I%Qé; '§§o{§_3f.¢g1«A SWAMY

 AI3iPE£1LV.'§Jo';'2§§L§ i'2GQS (LR)

BETWEEN?'  

  2, V.  Fziméfiigguda,

1. '$atag01.H?i¥'»'.."--., %  'A   A
S10 Balagouda Cvhfi-'p.ad.s,
Age. 60 years;'' Qcci
R / 0. N ag§'¢n1§7ad.i, V' "
 ' "'F31: ChjkQdVi,V Dist: Belgauna.

"  j Sfdé Kaiagonda Chopade,
 AA  Sfifyiears, Dec: Agfil.
" * R / (}.' :S3gY8I1'W3di,
'F.3i'; .C-fhilzodi, Dist: Belgaum.

    fiplpasahcb,

 S/0 Balagouda Chopadae,
 Age: 58 years, O00: Agil.
R/0. Nagzenwadi,
Ta}: Chikodi, Dist: Belgaum.

4, Sathyappa,

S/0 Parashuram Chopade,
Age: 51 years, Once: Agra}.

M/'



(BY Sri. Ra-1viS. Balikai, Afiv.) 

AN

u-.............__.

6;: ''

R/0. Nagyenwadi,
T31: Chikocii, Dist: Belgaum.

Bhcmmagouda,

Sfo Pa3'*as};1uran1 Chopade,
R] 0. Nagrenwadi,

Tal: Chikodi, Dist: Be1ga11_m.

The  1r;ibun;a_1, (31fikoc1i;*v%'
By its4.Cha3'{if111aI:,  if V

[}ist:5Beig:a11fxi§»._ V  

  '  ' 

W: M3j*3?,~«~§3"cc= skévsics, %
R -:3' ébatta Galli; 
Eisi: Belgaultth' _  

E' ' 'Vilias  Kiifliéirni,
"   VMajoz"",' «("}__<;g::vSe1vic:e,

Ric.) Qatta Galli, Chikodi,

' " .. V  Bélgaum.

' vigiznu Kuikarni,

Age; Major, Occ: Business,
R10 Datta Galli, Chikodi,

" D _3':§t: Belgaum.

H Smtfianda S. Kulkami,

Age: Major, Dec: fiousehold,
RIO Datta Gralli, Chikcdi,
Dist: Belgaum.

A;é;i.r3i;LANTs""% V

 RESPONDENTS

kg

This writ appeal is filed under seet;ion_.«…<§j
Kanzaiiaka High Court Act, praying to set aside the .

a

dated 12.9.2007 passeti by the learned Sifigglfiiu Jiidge, in "

W.P.No.40838/O1, and etc.

The appeal coming on far orders, this {lie}, :.?'e..,A«

delivered the following:

Though this appeelfiis erders for non»
c:omP3ia11ce_. same is heard for
admissiozx}, L ‘ % %

” *t§o file nature of finding of fact
1~eco1t:ie€1uV’i2v ti1e gxanting 3 acres of iand out of 8

S3y.No.160/2 on the basis of revenue

‘ KT€CQ1’!1_S;.We f1t;d that the applicant was tenant to an extent of

H ‘– for the remaanm’ ‘ g extent of 5 acres 3 guntas

oveaeiés heme is entered in Column No.12 of the revenue

” zeeorvéiss and the mode of cultivation is shown as “Swantha”.

Therefoxe, the iearned Single Judge did not interfere with the

order dated 21.1.32 passed by the Land Txibunai.

h»,/

3, After going through the H

impugned order, we do not find any merit in –« ..

it is accordingiy dismissed.

(pct/% = %