High Court Patna High Court - Orders

O. N. Ravi vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 29 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
O. N. Ravi vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 29 June, 2010
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.896 of 2000
                                             O. N. RAVI
                                                 Versus
                                  STATE OF BIHAR & ANR
                        For the petitioner: Shri S.D.Sanjay,Adv.
                   For the State: ShriYogendra Kumar Singh,A.P.P.
                                              -----------

9. 29.6.2010 This petition has been filed on behalf of the

petitioner who is the Company Secretary, SBI Funds

Management Ltd, which is located at the address appearing in

the petitioner’s address seeking an order for quashing the

proceedings initiated on Complaint Case No. 737C of l1999 on

the basis of which the order of summoning dated 18.8.1999 was

passed against the petitioner.

I have perused the complaint petition and I find

that the whole allegations are made, as regards sending of share

certificates for transfer and the subsequent reminders or replies,

against accused No.1, i.e., Assistant Manager, Datamatics

Financial Services Ltd. described at serial no.1 of the column of

accused of that particular complaint petition. It has been

mentioned, of course, in the complaint petition at one particular

place, i.e., at page 11 that the complainant received the duplicate

share transfer form which was fabricated and forged certificate

of transfer. But the basic issue was that the whole business of

transferring shares was never assigned to the petitioner who was

the Company Secretary rather it was the duty of accused no.1

described at serial no.1 of the array of the accused.

One may refer to the decision of the Supreme
2

Court reported in A.I.R.1983 S.C 67 Municipal Corporation of

Delhi Vs. Ram Kishan Rohtagi & ors. to point out that an

accused who has nothing to do with the day-to-day function of

the company of which the accused was an employee, like

Director or Managing Director, his acts could not be termed as

an act of offence. Considering the above, the order of

summoning was passed without any basis so as to putting the

petitioner O.N. Ravi on trial of complaint petition No. 737C of

1999. That order as regards the petitioner is quashed.

As regards the other accused, the proceedings on

the said complaint petition, after this order shall get revived and

be proceeded with.

Kanth                                    ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)