High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rajkumar Paswan &Amp; Anrs. vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rajkumar Paswan &Amp; Anrs. vs The State Of Bihar on 17 March, 2011
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Cr.Misc. No.45315 of 2010
                1. RAJKUMAR PASWAN, S/o Anirudh Paswan.
             2. Dinesh Kuamr Yadav, S/o Rajdhar Prasad Yadav.
                                 Versus
                          THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                -----------

02. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 25(1-B)A and 26 of the Arms

Act.

Considering that the petitioner No. 1 is the

Conductor and the petitioner No. 2 is the Khalasi of the

vehicle from where two country-made guns were found

and they have fair antecedents, let the petitioners, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in

connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 22 of 2010

subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioners and the other bailor shall be the

son/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in

the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall
2

clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused

in any other case and if they are they shall not be

released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar

nature after their release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of

misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers

on the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the

petitioners will be well represented on each date and if

they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-