In In HIGH comm' or _ cnzcurr amen AT A [ Datfid th.iS 'I13 2 15': j§ -- Br:F0RE A THE Horrnu: nanA.ms1$1c:ws%:T V. Kama: Writ Petu2:o' ' ;#q3og;3;2 éfsotxggkemcpci BETWEN: SHIVA NA1K..P1_i$1"1L.j " S/O"!f»W»14A NAIK 4 ' QCC A::;;R1I;.,__ _ " [R/0'H.ofs{JR if ' '-,TQ._SAUN"§}ATF! * . n1s"zf_ BVELGAV'U.M'~_ ' _ PETITDNER' ' kkk(;3y%JsriLH M 1)ha:ri@nd, Adv) %%%%% ' " 'vs'M'r'sABAKxA@TANGEWA ' xwzo smiaa NAIK PATIL AGE 47{:=YEARs Gcc ji-i(}USEHOLD WORK R/(3 TADASALOOR *~ VTQ SAUNDATTI BELGAUM ms? " sm GOPAVVA W/O SHESHA NAJK PATEL AGE 39 YEARS OCC HOUSE HOLD WORK R/O TADASALOOR 'I'Q SAUNDATTI DIST BELGAUM 3 SHANMUKAPPA SIDDANAGOUDER S/O BASAPPA AGE'. 68 YEARS occ AGRIL R/0 HOSUR TQ SAUNDATTI {DIST BELGAUM o 4 THE TAHASILDAR SAUNDATFI 'I'QSAUNDA'I'I'I V .3 ms? BELGAUM '.;..1zE_,smNDEms (By Sri K,-B. Aciy.=;ifl--I9i1f}_G~P' 'fo;~oR~«i) TI-RS WRIT PE'§'ITI'f-Nfii -IS'-§'IL,E:D UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF' THE CQHSTTTUYITON OF ENDEA, "VPRAYI_MGv..:TO_'_. DERECT THE 475 RESPONDENT TO. CONSEBWQ'Ti-iE_fi:dPI,I€3£i.'1'I'€)'i\I OF' THE PETITIONER
VIBE} AN’NEXUR.€;¢IIi AND
_’oN FOR P:Rm.nvm\IARY IEARING ms
DAY, T§3.’EuCOUR’I? FOLLOWBJG:
“ormnn
‘V ‘A a Without any rhyme or reason by a person,
A has suffcrm an ex patte decree and who is
agfipmhonofive that even during the pendency of the final
1orocoedi11gs, the decree holder, taking advantage of
‘ ”’v.fiie’Aju<igmcnt, has applied to the thasildar to change the
d V' "revenue records to the exclusive name of the decree holder
—- third respondent herein – and is also apprehexusivc that
notwithstanding the petitioner has
representations to the tahsildalf, the’
into consideration or may overlook ~ ”
and therefore has issue
of a writ of mandamus to” tahsildar
not to enter the of in the revenue
records 3 ‘Jdeeree proceedings
before Vneeiwebioner has also sought
for a sale deed executed by
responglerotsv of third respondent as 11111}
and voi£ie,~–._ as version of the petitioner that the
v have executed such sale deed even
of the final decree proceedings.
on behalf of the petitioner, Sri R 13 Desai,
counsel, would urge the above gonads to seek for
no prayers made in the writ petition. Submission is that
‘ even though the petitioner is aggieved by the ex parte-
deeree and when the petitioner has initiated proceedings to
get over this and even during the pendcn¢y.:_ 0f such
proceedings, the tahsildar C&I}1{}- ot make the faxjtijies
which can affect the rights of _
the writ as prayed for should wua-id. : k
3. The writ petition is “of and ‘the
fear of the petitioner’ fi>iic’v«q1:éstior1ing any
administrative acfiofi action, warrantillg
review by M% V’ x
4. In for issue of a Writ of
the objection before the tahsildar
in a at the instance of the thllid
‘tic-cs not become an inaction for examination of
»’ i:h_i$ issuing a writ of mandamus. It is open to the
ii:5″V..pursue the matter before the tahsildar or
court.
E.’
A’ J; Vvwithout prejudice to such possibiiitics, this writ:
” jiéiition is dismissed.
Sd/-}
mjk Iudgé