High Court Karnataka High Court

Venkatappa vs State & Ors on 21 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Venkatappa vs State & Ors on 21 October, 2010
Author: Jawad Rahim
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 215?' DAY OF OCTOBER   '

BEFORE:-I  

THE HON'Bi_E MR.3USTICE«JlI--IA/'ADRv.Rif*!I.E'«3. I 

MISC.CVL..N€I).'

   

£78.65 I 2T9Q.:9_I   I
LRRP;'NIO..28_4T4'-1. Z "1'g1gg,, A

BETWEEN:  

VENKATAPPA»,  ;j_   ..

S/o.AKKANNA VFs'3UNI:'{I'~'\I3P'+\..» 

AGED ABOUT 42'.,\/EARS   _ _*
R/0.KADADONAHAL.LI_vI.I,I;A;;E

MALUR  '   

KOLAR DISTRICT ' _  "   PETITIONER

,,.}g(E':Y.SRI B';I~T....i{vRIsNNA BHAT, ADV.)

A  .1  .1s.TA'TECV_ve<'ARNATA+<A

.  BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
 M.._s.'I=,I_Dc;, DR.AMaEDI<AR ROAD
BAi'~E._GALORE--1

  "2'=-._THVE LAND TRIBUNAL

*. _f:VIALUR TALUK, MALUR KOLAR DIST.
BY ITS SECRETARY

  HAJEE ISMAIL SAB

S/O.LATE HAJEE SYED
ABDUL, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS

3.(a) SAYYAD AFIS SAB
S/O.HAJI ISMAIL, MAJOR



3.(b) SAYYAD ABUBAKER
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

(a) a (13) ARE REsIDENTs OF

NANIAMMA LAYOUT  

NEAR DYAPASANDRA CO-OR.s:OCIE7v 

MALOOR TOWN   .1

MALUR TALUK 

P.O.MALUR    '   _ 
KOLAR DIsTRICT  "  ;..,VRE1sR.O'NDE'NTs

(sRI.NAsRuLLA KHAN, HCc3P:'FOR'--.R1 &'R"2--;-_ 
NOTICE TO R3 (A--'s) IS_'HELD"SU.FFICIENT;

R6 sD/- & uNRER'REsENT_ED');,
MISC.CVL.17865/2310'?-DIS 'FI_CE_D "uN;DE'R" ORDER I RULE
10 C.P.C. PRA'a'1l'§l_'G '=l'O;P.ERMITv.j_r'lfO ;'i3RINO PROPOSED
RESRONDENTSA,S.I,&:5.ION RECO.E?.D_--.v V "" "
THIS:...;g«IIis?:;.VCvL.AR'§L'I'C.A?rI"ON"g Is COMING ON FOR
i=uRTI--IERs-..OR5DERs»V.TI4Is.. DAYr,~ll--r'i'HE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING_:   1.  --

   E R

 rIot'iced_ ____ that respondents 4 and 5 are not

»s;erv_Ved.,_Howpever, learned counsel Sri.M.D.Kumar submits

filed vakalath on behalf of proposed

resp’ond’eVnt'”l\lo.4–K.N.Narasimhaiah and respondent No.5-

‘:f..Si’r1it..’DoVi§i Muniyamma. Thus, notice to R4 and R5 having

* been served, service is held sufficient.

2. Heard regarding application filed under Orderl

Rule 10 C.P.C. which is supported by an affidavit of one

– 3 _
Venkatappa in which he has deposed that responden_t__No.4

and S are subsequent purchasers of property
No.18 of Nalappanahalii \/ilfage while proposed’ *
No.6 has purchased portion of |anc!…i.n.__S’urgie§/v”4I\io’j,fié3′: in
same viilage. V A’ A i it i it

3. Satisfied. L % A

4. Applicationis alfoVAweVd’;v:._”?hey .ar’ei–ir_npl.eaded as

respondent !\£os.4, 5 ‘&:i’T6.. amend the

causetivtl.e..oa_fid.i_ii’ié*i1n_arriepded—r:.o.p’§ of the petition.
Two’ weeks.Vti’oieiigr.a:hte’d to do the needful.

Sd/–:

Iudgé