High Court Kerala High Court

The Vallapuzha Service Co-Op. … vs The Joint Registrar Of on 25 September, 2006

Kerala High Court
The Vallapuzha Service Co-Op. … vs The Joint Registrar Of on 25 September, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 17615 of 2006(V)


1. THE VALLAPUZHA SERVICE CO-OP. BANK
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. SRI.P. MOHAMMED, FORMER SECRETARY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

 Dated :25/09/2006

 O R D E R
                               K.THANKAPPAN, J.
                           ------------------------------------
                           W.P.(C)NO. 17615 OF 2006
                           ------------------------------------


                   Dated this the 25 th day of September, 2006


                                     JUDGMENT

The petitioner – Bank filed this Writ Petition challenging the

jurisdiction of the first respondent – Joint Registrar of Co-operatives

Societies (General), Palakkad to consider Ext.P15.

2. Ext.P15 is the representation filed by the second respondent

before the Joint Registrar challenging the suspension order passed by the

petitioner. The main ground urged in the Writ Petition is that after

2.1.2003, dispute regarding the service of an employee of a Co-operative

Society shall be raised under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative

Societies Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) before the

Arbitration Court established for that purpose and hence, the first

respondent has no jurisdiction to consider Ext.P15.

3. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the

provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder, this Court is of the

W.P.(C)NO.17615/2006 2

view that the first respondent has no jurisdiction to consider Ext.P15. It is

so declared.

The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed without prejudice to the

right of the second respondent to seek his remedy under law before the

appropriate forum.

(K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE)

sp/