High Court Karnataka High Court

Mahadeva S/O Late Siddegowda @ … vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 11 April, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Mahadeva S/O Late Siddegowda @ … vs The Special Land Acquisition … on 11 April, 2008
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri
IN HIE mar»; COURT 0:? KARNATAKA AT BANGA1,mei::,,'_~     _
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL, 2:x;s%_f    1
BEFORE V 1' " u

THE HONELE MR, JUSTICE Asgox  §i'INCHl{§e_Efi~"§I "  

WRY1' PETITION No.33 15  (1.15-R_e5) 
8 EM _  _ 

1 MAHADEVA  AL 

s/0 LATE s1D9EGowDA'@'T:{,x§4A:m H";  " ' 
AGED ABOUT 46      

2 SMI'. MARAMMA-"@"kfiM?A?§§%§&A  K
we LATE__I&iO'*MBA£.gEGQ_W'DA " 
AGED AZBOIYI'-55_vYE.?;RS_ 

BOTH ARE RESiDIN(.},A'}"*«.._  
KUTHAGALE VILLA-(}£=1.  .. 
UYAMBALLI H~0Bm,;.j--_
KANAKAPKERA T'Q.,_ '

 - ..£2AN;4?§NA£';ARA D1S"1'.~-- ----- ~ *

3 %%%%sM+r; =:i)E*JAr.;1h.a;§ 
W;Gj;:,A'iE"'~:;;iI1§A--SIDDEG0wDA
AGED"'ABOU'3'__ '20 YEARS

M  'ksm. KEMPAMMA @ JAYAMMA

 two? LA'1'E'§*U*ITA$wAMYG0wDA
 % .. 13{}ED«--.AB(3UT 65 YEARS

 .1AjA'.'Kié;m5EGowL)A

  $1.0 LATE SHIVANEGOWDA
" AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

63  MUDDAMAREGOWDA

S [ O LATE MAVATHU REGOWDA



A:~;x>- 

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

ALL ARE R [0 HONNIGANAHALLI VILLAGE
NARAYANAPURA POST, KASABA HOBALI
KANAKAPURA TQ.

RAMANAGARA DIST.

MAHENBRA

S/(3 LATE K M RAMARAJE URAS
AGED ABOUT 45 'YEARS _ _
R/C) BASHAWESWARA NAGAR  _
KANAKAPURA TOWN   '
RAMANAGARAM DIST-5&2 117  '

K MJAYARAMARAJE URAE3  R_ , ,
S/O LATE KEMPARAJE URA'S_  '
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS;"  ~ 
R/AT KOI)1HALLi 'RQAD  " ~ "  V.
H.M. DHODDI, KAI<-iAKAPU1?A_VTO$V§{.
RAMANAGAF-AM..D1s*r»--562.i1 3:2"   '

 PETITIONERS

F, _;j' '(BY sR;":J_ § VLINVGARAJU, ADVOCATE)

"-VTIs§:;"sPB:zjIAL'-yawn ACQUISITION OFFICER

RAM?;NAGRA'M'.JSUB--DIv1si0N
RAMANAGRA'j_£)i'ST~571 51 1

_ 4 {THE m§U.T§coMM1ss1oNER
  VRAMANAQRA 1313?,
 4 ..mMA.:§AG¥2A~s71 511

% ..AfA'.'Tfi'E»'h.}1ANAG1NG DIRECTOR
  CAUVERY NIRAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED

 15'? FLOOR, K.H,B. BUILDING
~ SARSWATHIPRUAM

MYSORE-580 O09
. .. RESPONDENTS

4. Sri Keshava Raddy, AGA submits that there appearsV:f0_’»h¢

some interpolation of dates on the basis of which V.

Whether the applgicafions for the 1t–(1§:termin3tief;:j u ” =

compcnsafion are filed within the prescxiiigcd

Needless to observe that all the contczitiqns

5. N0 order as to costs.

bvr