Smt.G.Pushpavathi vs The Commissioner on 11 June, 2009

 

..E..

BEF0RE *I' %& ,
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1c£: fRAM  REDDY
WRIT PETrrI0m-19. 1539 1%/.2059 {LB--RES)

BETWEEN VVVV _ V
1 SMT.G.Bu'SaPAVATHI  "   
D/O LATE} (§j()_P.AL SEAT  V ' '
AGEDi'ABg:mT 54 .YEAii?Sé"  
R/AT \?ATAi§;A_HOSAHAL'L}~ VILLAGE
Go'WmB1Ts3AN't}R TALUs< .
CIiIK_I<;&Bfl-LL;AP{IR"DISTRICT.
 " ' _  ...PETI'I'fONER

(By Sn' RAI§5IA..MOHAN A&»_bASSOCfATES)

 _:_  _T.THf::"eQ;¥EmzVi'ssJoNER

. 'r;FF1<::Ej~oIj~? THE ENDOWMENT COMMSISION,

' .11 F'LQ€}_Rj,: ALBERT VICFOR £20 13,
CJHAMARAJPE ,
BAHQALORE 18..

_  DEPUTY COMMISSIGNER

 '(}FFICE OF' THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
E CHIKKABALALPUR TOW

'[ CHIKKABALLAPUR,

% '~  is THE TAHSILDAR

GCJWRIBHDANUR TALUK

GOWRIBIDANUR. M

 



 

 

.2-

4 THE CHIEF SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF' KARNATAKH  .
VIDHANA SOUDHA  
BANGALORE I

5 THE SECRETARY  
VATADAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE _
PANCHAYAT NAGAR-  
NAGARAGERE HGBEJ §
GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK  ,
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT:

6 sR1vMQ£eA&ANAYAK_,..=  ''
s/0 v.M.:: NZ1YA5{    1;. ,
AGED gazgscmi'.-3£;§§YEA«:2}S;«   
CONVENER  '   . _ 

SR1 .GHANNAKE?.$HAVA- SWAMY TEMPLE
vA'rADAHc:sAHALL:'V%  . j
Gowmatmamjg 'l'ALU.K; _
cH1KKABALLAPu'R D";$"rR'Jc:'1'.
 -  2   RESPONDENTS

(By Sn’ R.DEV’DAS,. Am”;

Indisputabiy the petitioner does not possess a

licence to carry on hotel business in a premises located

ir°\

-3-

adjacent to the temple of the… fidveifjr « _ = ‘V

Channakeshavaswamy at

allegation that the 5″! re$itr9ncief1t_– ‘Gra1ne’i ‘ ”

demolished the hotel premi§e$’Withe11t..VV:rjetice to the
petitioner and has of a building,

presently at the tbundaifion ‘pfesented this

the Secretary of the State of
KaI’I1atai{a_é{.’1(1 the of the Grama Panchayat,

not tgemgt ..Q”Ijy”‘C0i1SfI11C1;i0n on the disputed. area

J of writ petition.