IN THE: HIGH C:C}UR'I' ca? KARNATAKA
emcvrr BENCLH AT DHARWAD V %
Dated this the 18"' Day of February, «' A'
Before ' V L. M V
ms: Homam MR JUSTICE _
Criminal Revision Pgzizggn ;§¢;:gé52 " VA
Between: ' h V «V R
MANJUNATH HANUMFLISTA -
:L§P{,t§;:2a:§i M KHANNUR, ADV)
And: ' V H H
'%i!§j;?f0R BHASKAR NAIR
z'%G'E1£}-LABQUT: 3{}"'2"EAi?S
' 'v0<:am;31NEs
grcs ;;.E::V_iE. R ROAEZ),
I'»iAL1YA_1;~,,.e_$a::v329 RESPONDENT
(By Sri 1. -:»%2AxAsH B ANGAQI, ADV)
(:;r~2L.Rp 1:32.30 U] S. 39? R/W 4:}; 09 CR.P.C BY THE
“~_ Aai/G(:A’z*E FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HOWBLE; com? MAY BE PLEASED T0 SET ASIDE THE
M
ORBER mmn 12/03/2008 IN CRL.A.NG.3/;?fiO?VVP$S§§E~D
BY’ THE COL¥R’I’ op DiS’¥’R§C’£’ AND sEss_§o2-:VATwaébcéég,
XJTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR Am frag:’Jij’:>£’§£»1$?a’i§V_Ami”
ORDER DATE{) 07/12/2006 IN :Q.c;–,wfi;S’13)A200S’V$332335 ‘
BY THE COURT ()1? CIVIL, qUnGAE,:”{J;%.n1~:;’;_A’NB ‘;41’z’v:*F'<':«,,
HALIYAL.
THIS Rsvlszeéf’~V~..1:>g’3*’i’z’;QN§.__3$~–..c0M;1§:c§ on FOR
ASMISSION mxs DAY, %m: MADE THE
FOLLOWING: ” ‘
against the order passed by the
Distxifii u and ‘ “‘««ji1dge, Kaxwm’ in Cr1.Appea.1
N0..:3,i_V2O0’7; the oréer of convictien anti
3¢;:§en.ca pggsseci B’y'”‘:-;1:e amps, Haliyal in C.C.No.5}f3/2005
ngtesj :2; 1-i>;’>2?§:0i:%sr5>.
2. ~~i§r:a1~d the imaumed ceungel for the respective parties.
A V _” AA’;1’i1¥é~«::_::arties are Exist) present befsre the court.
yér
3. According to the resp0ndt3nt«c0mp1ajnani, the agzcused
has mczeiveei a sum of Rs.3,30,0{}O/ ~ from mm
sci} his Tractor and ‘Trailer, su¥3$equenfly,__.–§{§é’ ”
ageeé to refund the said amount a1sQ”iSs{i¢{§ &V:(:}1cq1%e”
fer Rs.1,3{),{){)0/- dateé 22-9-2:€3{}5:_-AAa¥.;4a.v%::;_.’ :z;§:»;*- fa2%jc;gr’=;:;_;’£
Varada Gramcena Bank,
éishonoared when it was T {b iigslzfiicicnt
funds. *_-a ‘the: petiiioner for
n0n–paym¢fi’¥, _’«.. not pay the amount.
“issu::-sijv a iegal notice, which was
seIveé’~ 01:i »~9-2005, and the matter was
t::o1:1tcsted”.»__ held that there is legaiiy
enfcifceable ciéébt. ¢Lfaé,-:[1fi:e;r issuancfi of due iegal notice, the
.A ts pay the amount to the I’t”:Sp€)I1d€1}1. it is
.;iBQ there is no rebuttal eviécnce and
accused for the efience under Sectioza 138 of
N.t3g0t;ia’t1¢l£ Instrumcxlts Act and ordered ta pay a fine of
;f,4{},0OQ/- and in default to undergo $i1:np1e
‘V impri&0nment for a pt§I’i{){i of one year. Furthsr, acting under
aw
4
Section 3:3? of Cr.P.C., it is ordemd that the fine amount
shall be paié as compenaation to the compiainant, if
recovered Against which, an appea}. was prefemtzd’ by the
petitioner before the {)iS1ZI’i(3t Judge, Karwar. “~iZ_§i3§xict
Juége confinned “the: order of conviction t7haV.+_ ‘j1’_.I:é§i¢
no irrrszgulazity or illatgality in Mg;onvicfiu1g..
petitionsr.
4. It cgf :jQ1′.”e:’ V’ counsel fer the
;3e’ti'{;i(§1}e-;~ deposited a sum of
Rs.s§:-‘,,op£§]’4V5′.M%1§ef§?§:§ Haliyal and the balance
amo11A:1t (5f no he paid, for which, he sacks
for resgsonab-16 V’
‘ for the msiaondent submitted {hat the
A].¥€f%Vfi’Ei()3.’1é:f(; borrowed a sum of Rs.1,30,Q0{)/ – and ahead};
fem’ haw: btten. alapseé, even the fine] compensation
a §3;3u11t woulé not be suficicnt to meet the interest and the
manta} agony sufiéitzd by the respczrzcient.