High Court Kerala High Court

Rema P.T. vs Tahsildar on 28 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Rema P.T. vs Tahsildar on 28 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32852 of 2010(F)


1. REMA P.T., W/O.SURESH BABU,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. CHAKKIARAN VEETTIL SANTHA, CASUAL
3. REKHA.K., CASUAL SWEEPER,
4. N.KAMALA, CASUAL SWEEPER,
5. SHYJA C., CASUAL SWEEPER,
6. SHEEBA K.P., CASUAL SWEEPER
7. LAKSHMI.K., CASUAL SWEEPER,
8. RATHNAMMA K.K., CASUAL SWEEPER
9. USHA V.M., CASUAL SWEEPER
10. SREEJITHA.V., CASUAL SWEEPER,
11. RAJAVALLY T., CASUAL SWEEPER
12. THANKAMMA V.T., CASUAL SWEEPER
13. SUJATHA V.K., CASUAL SWEEPER
14. E.S.PADMINI, CASUAL SWEEPER,
15. SYAMAL N.V., PLANNIYANNUR VILLAGE
16. VIMALA P.K., CASUAL SWEEPER
17. ANASUYA, CASUAL SWEEPER

                        Vs



1. TAHSILDAR, THALASSERY TALUK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR.

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :28/10/2010

 O R D E R
                            S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                      ==================

                       W.P.(C).No.32852 of 2010

                      ==================

               Dated this the 28th day of October, 2010

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are part time casual sweepers working in various

village offices under the 1st respondent-Tahsildar, Thalassery Taluk.

They have certain grievances regarding payment of salary. According

to them, they are also entitled to have service book opened in their

names. Detailing their grievances, the petitioners have filed Exts.P8 to

P8(o) representations before the 1st respondent. The petitioners seek

expeditious disposal of those representations.

2. The learned Government Pleader points out that the

Tahsildar has no powers to decide the question raised by the

petitioners and only the 3rd respondent can.

3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with

the following directions:

The 1st respondent shall forward Exts.P8 to P8(o) representations

to the 3rd respondent within two weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment. The 3rd respondent shall consider and pass

orders on Exts.P8 to P8(o) representations, after affording an

opportunity of being heard to a representative of the petitioners, as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the

date of receipt of Exts.P8 to P8(o) representations from the 1st

w.p.c.32852/10 2

respondent. The petitioners shall produce a certified copy of this

judgment before respondents 1 and 3 for compliance.

Sd/-

sdk+                                          S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

          ///True copy///




                             P.A. to Judge