High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Md Musa Sait Wakf vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara … on 16 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M/S Md Musa Sait Wakf vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara … on 16 October, 2009
Author: H N Das
IN THE HIGH COURT 0}? KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE

DATED THIS THE 16"' DAY OF OCTOBE.I':V(V:fi(LB--T}D{V) '  H 
BETWEEN: ' in ' ' 3 V'

M/S MDMUSA SAIT WAK_F_  
REP_BYITS M1;1fHAWA;L1,  _ ..  
SRIMMUNEER  _     
No.22,     
YAFA GUEST.  N 121,001: A "  
cHEN"reAI'+--6Q'§:,006;'iiH:   

 _ --    " _.PETITIONER

(By Sri SANDESH j';c_HQ'U»TA;»HVADV.)

1.. . 'BRUHAH --jB};1§IGALoRE MAHANAGARA PALIKE

TH'ROU_G3{-THE OFFICE OF THE

 COMMISSIONER, REX/'EE\IUE DEPARTMENT
H ~  SHIVA]I1\IAGAR RANGE,
 BANGALORE.

  '2. THE ASST. REVEN'L.H9: OFFICER

SHANTHI NAGAR RANGE

axv



MAYO HALL
BAi\IGAL{)RE.

(By Sri B.'/".MLl'I3{ALIDII_AR, ABVJ   '

This writ petition filed under  225 %&i.227 
Constitution of India praying In -set asidt: the im'pttgn¢d 1ri;:3tiVc:e,

dated 4.1.2008 passed by the 2" respcnéent aspect'. TA;nn"e;x;fife~A.
This petition comitigon   this day,
the court made the f0§§mvir;g;--. 1 '   " --

Sri B.\i;.*i'¥§'Iptra§lidhar,V.itzetrne<1; Standing counsel is directed to
take notice.  respo1id.é':2.tié.;"--  i i V.

..   'In thiéi patitittm, the petitioner has prayed fer a writ in

' tlié --natz.;;*e  iézertiarari to quash the notice cum speciai notice

;.:n§gg- sgictikm 7142?, Schedule in pm 11 Rule 3 am} 9 of the

 Kamataltéi Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and the reievant

' '-.R;ti§F.'§' propesirgg ta revise taxes.

3, A Bivisien Bench 0? this csurt between the partim
herein halt} that in ¥'i€W (if repeaiing of Ruies 8 anti 9 of Part H of

Ssheéuie IE1, rmtice under tha said provisiens is urisustainabie in





law. Again the respondents have issueci the impugn_éd  V.

which is ideaticai to the eariier notice. For the in”

W’.A.2083i2007 and connected matter A’

following:

()R]);}_3Ii§’::

i) W1-ii petitionxéis-V:iie:’iibyi’:;éi:i§ivE:i§§iy:. 1

ii) Tiigz « sjiiiiifiial notice éated
“”” H is hereby quashed.
iiifii at liberty to take action to
ciniie-sifi in accordance with the procedure
ivaiifiplifiable to them under law.
‘iV)V .« accordingly.

1 ifhrea weeks time is granted {O the responéerits’

counsei to fila mama of appearance;

sd/~
iabgz

DKB