High Court Karnataka High Court

Srinivas S/O Veerashetty vs C Narasa Reddy on 27 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Srinivas S/O Veerashetty vs C Narasa Reddy on 27 August, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF     _

CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBz".§(2r1:%;':: «

DATED THIS THE 27TH  A:_;L;us>r%%

PRI_§_)SEN'.P_""

THE HONBLE MI-2. Jfisdficg  RAD

THE HON 'BLE 

  

 £§;s1:?§:ENIvAsE GOWDA

 :5:  1579/2004 (MV).

BETwCEN:CA%fiCCjC%;, "

1\/Iast:§i=.Si~1'1nvc-14.5,'  3 . L   .. C : 
S/o Vecrashctty,  » V 
Aged abo1.1t;V9Vye.ars,  '

OCC§upa1:io11: 'Nil,

 *  _ Resident Cf.Vifl1a''I"pnr,
, Talukz Hutnnabad,

Disi:;tiCt:_ E'».i"(iar',*.

1  '1_'hi(Cu'gh"h1s.natura1

G-u8LI'dia;1ff;:xfl1er
Vet-':-rashctty,

  S/0 C'-hzmdrappa,

.   Agcd about 32 years,
 Occupation: Labour,
 'Residcnce of Vithalpur,

 Taluk: Humnabad,
 '"Dist1°ict: Bidar and

New residing at
Basavanagar Colony,



Bidar.  

(By Sri Basavaraj R. Math, Adv.,)  >

AND:

1.

C. Narasa Roddy, V
ownerormmy,
Bearing No. AP-9/U’4iZ.289;i ” jé
5-2410,
Raisaie Abobulla, — ”

NLJ. Market,
Hyderabad, i

2. Nationai
P1ot No.6,’ P1.1l1ir1i. ‘Complex, —
Opp:._APMC M$i1’ket~Ii,i.__ = ‘

Phase:-11,” Sectgt’-194C,__

Varshi 4460 705,;

Thmugh it3,BI*ai1ch Manager,
vlaigtzioiial msiniangcv Company Limitcd,

A “‘rari§:h f:3édar (Near
‘ B-asaveswaf Circia,

…Re.spondcnts

_ 1_(By ér: sangom, Adv., for R2)

~”I’his Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed U/s 173(1) of

M;V Act against the Judgment and Award dated 29-11-2003

-passed in MVC No.185/2002 on the file of the Add}. Civil
‘ Judgt: (Sr.Dn) 85 11 Add}. MACT, Bidar, partiy allowing the

claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of
compensation with interest at 12% P.A..

This MFA coming on far hearir-‘ ;

RAD. J, delivered the following:– > i j _

-sJ’lV.TI.)(‘il:I§.Iilj:i’v;_”‘–

The appellant — petitiorxefgtt minor
aged about 7 years, cf lag above
K1166 uPte thigh. M A . ‘V

2. As pct if the total disability
win he 80% by the Tribunal. The
notional t’:_i;’V be assessed at Rs.2,10()/-

per mm;1t11.” .SinCc’ is being assessed on the

basis ‘xzatinriai accelerated benefit of aimost 1 1

the petitioner whiic assmsing and granting

neutralise the benefit of acceleration, 3

VV”1:1ui”tip§ies a.fetieductcd and 15 multiplier would be just and

4.”;;:t§§per__’for'”t.onsidcri11g the loss of future earning capacity.

“of incame proportionate to disability would be

t%R6;1(680/_.

On the reassessment of evidence, petitioner is entitled

to Rs.i,O0,000/- fer pain and sufihwiiag, R$.1,00,000/* for

QE/

loss of amcénitics, Rs.25,000/- for

J ”

expenses and Rs.1680/- per moiith ‘

multiplier m Rs.3,02,40(}/- for __Io5égi”” futtuii

acczmnt of disability, _i’o:rV” 01;} marriage
prospects and IQs.50,000«i’cir rciiliiccment of
artificial leg, from tjirie to is entitlcd to
a total c£)mp€;i34$%}:ti¢in.V:3–. A – as against
Rs.2,16,60G/- On the enhanced
interest at 6% 13.3.. from
the date of

3. oi; éiihanced coxgapensation shall be
the: minor attains majority.

accordm’ gly.

Sd/-~
Judge

Sd/-*
Iudge