High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Bassappa vs Sri Amruthgouda on 18 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Bassappa vs Sri Amruthgouda on 18 February, 2009
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure
Hi '£'I*§E EEG-E COXIRT OF' KARNATAKA,
CIRCHIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

§$.TEB ram 18373 DAY me FEBRUARY 20??   w

PRESENT

THE ;~mr«:* am MR. JUSTICE V. G.  - _  "

AND

Tag H933' am EEK. JIZSTICE A53.  "

MSSELLANEGUS FIRST Apfifigy ml." 595;VA29o'i('1v;*v;':
BE-':'~%.:«:;:EN :   
Basappa S] 9 Sicidappa Pujai;§,'A_ _

Aged about 46 years, 000: Coésiief. '

R} 0 Shivapur, Tq: Jewargi,
Di.s'£.: Grulharga,  V

 """   Q     Aifiilfillarxt

{By Sri. Baséivaraj RV."'}x<1'§zt}i, 
1.

!%.mrutl1gouda”S,/C» Sh’;mk.aré:gouda Maiipatil,

Age: M;1j()x”, OcC: fitjivfir of’1″racf.0r
” ‘N0. ,(_’1″ .341, R’/0-Shivapur,
Tq; .Jexx*ax*gi.; Dist; Gulbarga.
:2. Baswantlxraya Gouda,

Sii3.x_::€:’ dead R3

(51) Sha.nkareg::=’z1da,
*{b) Vmtpakshappa E?/0 Shankamgouda

‘«.__{<;§t Amrtifiiggsuzia Le. Rctspondent N0. 1
" N%;:.gaIf1g0uda SE 0 Sha11k'a1"gou{i.3
{e}_£%.g;sa?j;a7a11tra§;e: Gouda 8/ <3 Eats: S.h;»mk2:rgz:mdTa

E3} was majiars, R] (3 Séhivapur, Tq: Jawargi,

M Gist: Gtlibaxga.

REA }~§Q.69S.7 2

:3. §mampat€1S/0 Khajapatei,
Age: Major, Occ: Qwner ef tmliy
E330. §. (3) (3:2): as. ({3}; gm; ,

Sri. Mastak Fatal, Advocate for R~3})_ ” _ V_ V V

‘§’H§S M1scE1..LANE0:.:s FiRST__P,,P_P*EAL :’::§–._§’1z.;3I:: UNDER
SECTiON :73 (1) 0}? MVACS’ AEEAIE’-ESE” ma JUDGMENT ANS
AWARD mmm 13. 1€).20()6″«-_Pfs_SS.{3I3:’_ ~1.N”~Mvc:;«;-:o. 193/2003 ON
mg FILE 0;?’ THE PRL. s§;_ss..:wa’:»:2’sIs_.’ ;-IL:.;;>*{::-_E AND MACE’,
GULBARGA, PAR”I’LY._ ALLQ.5}.?–I,NG ‘TEE ‘ €Zi.LA’E§./I” PEYITION FOR
(I:{3MPENSAT£ON ..-%:*é§3 SEE§::£I.\;G~.”_~.._ ENHANCEMENT 2:)?
COMPENSAT§{)N. = ”

THISjMF’A.fST’LC§)i§«’fi<Es¥{§«OE ORQERS ON TEES EIAY, THE
coam' MADE} 'THE r«*Q:;.:;;_Qw*:;§'::,:;
% " manna.

‘I’}r1r§”a?~:c*:: __LL€2?z~é§ks” “€i1?:;a§:____Ai::s granted to cmllpijg with the x:3fiice:

£:¥§:jeiefi§q:;*;3:.$, the appeal shad} stanii dismissed Without

‘ V §’11I’fl£i,€i}f’.GF1§.€v§.,;?S Vfiourt.

Sci] –

J1} DGE

Sd,/-

JUDGE

3\xfl3A 290.695.? 3

Desiaite the order dated 18,02.20()9,
appeliant has not done the needfui. ” V V ‘

fiance, the appeal is dismissed fcrfii4no:3’~Tpfi’o§;c<:'12f.i€i11,,'
aft11e order datscl 38.02.2009. ' " ' ' '

V. . W' % not -«
TBy:SWK _ ._ .__c¢r:w$A8ench,K§L?§:'?t§:,

M 3*"