High Court Kerala High Court

M/S. Transport Corporation Of … vs Commercial Tax Inspector on 28 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S. Transport Corporation Of … vs Commercial Tax Inspector on 28 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 3131 of 2008(W)


1. M/S. TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,

3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

4. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,

5. M/S. MARIKKAR ENGINEERS PRIVATE LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.V.GEORGE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :28/01/2008

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ===============
                 W.P.(C) NO. 3131 OF 2008 W
                =====================

           Dated this the 28th day of January, 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

The detention of 12 Skoda cars transported in two trucks

belonging to the petitioner, ordered as per Exts.P10 and P11 is

under challenge. Going by the irregularities noticed, according to

the Department, in both the trucks three cars each were not

supported by any document. Petitioner has an explanation for

this irregularity noticed by the Department. According to the

petitioner, by a mistake, cars were not loaded in the order in

which it is mentioned in the invoice. According to them, on a

proper verification it can be seen that all vehicles are covered by

proper invoices although truck number varies.

2. Though factually it is as stated above, the bonafides of

this is a matter to be enquired into by the Department. I do not

think that in the meanwhile, it is necessary to continue the

WPC 3131/08
:2 :

detention of the vehicles. Petitioner undertakes that the 5th

respondent being consignee, who is also registered under the

KVAT is willing to provide security in the form of bond without

sureties.

3. If that be so, I direct that if the 5th respondent

furnishes a bond without sureties as above along with a certified

copy of its Certificate of Registration, the vehicles detained as

per Exts. P10 and P11 along with the trucks shall be released to

the petitioner. Thereafter adjudication shall be held and the

parties will be governed by the order to be passed.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp