IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 09?" DAY OF OCTOBER--«2D®.V:_'
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HUL
CRIMINAL g;;T1T1oN N0.46§2 0152909 = A
BETWEEN:
1 A SR1 RATHILAL BA:H£.MJIOAO.OHO:.
S/OGAPATEL '
65_YEARS__ A
R/AT SHAN'F.HIN_AG R ISV"F..}3:LuOC:E:{'
K_OLARi_SOMF_fUR'A 12_oA13,.
VJAYAFU---R'A'T_QW1f§_I3--ES}fAIxIA.HALLI TALUK.
Fr_:O1V{ESO,El\?"»;'$_{V.Y_ TR'/ATOl5:'TAO;f.().3'7_',6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN
KHB' COLONY,' 'r'.EL.AHANKA, BANGALORE 64.
2 5121 PRENIJIV S--/OLATE BHIMEH PATEL
A ._;f 60 YEAR'S ' V
A {R/'AT LAKSHM1' SAW MILL,
V A. , KLQLAR"ROAD, SHANTHINAGARA
O"»'IJAYAi?{§RA TOWN DEVANAHALLI TALUK.
* A PETITIONERS
(By Sr:.L¢xA§<is, Adv.)
" 1 SMT VEERAMMA
W/O LATE CHOWDA?PA
A (By"Sri.GLB}i2iYani Singh, SPF)
71 YEARS
R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE
VLIAYAPURA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TAL'UK,-.'j_ .
2 SMT PADMAMMA w/0 LATE cH0wDARPA« ~
AGED 66 YEARS
R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE, _
VIJAYAPURA HOBL1, A "A
DEVANAHALL1 TALUK.
3 SR1 C VENKATESH S/GMLATE CH0WDAPi1P'A..S,
AGED 41 YEARS
R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE,__
VIJAYAPURA HDBLI, , f '
DEVANAHALLI T'ALUK,_ S '
4 SR1 C GOVI-JSIDAR"/X}LT::'S/()..LA;1;i'E1C.i§O'WDAPPA
AGED i36'VYEA:RS."'~_ M A
R/AT BYRAPURA'J_I'LLAGE,
VIJ'A_YAPURAfHQB.LI;
DEVANAHVALLITALUK.
5 STATE RER. BY VEAYARURA POL£CE
.
‘ A . Y IJEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE.
' ...RESPONDliiN'I'S >I}=
his Criminai Petition is fiied under Section 482 of
praying to quash the FIR registered by Vijayapura
XV
Police Station, Devanahalii, Banglaore in Crime No.87{2009
dated 6.6.2009. ‘
This Criminal Petition coming on for orders
Court made the following-
Petitioners have sought for to;”:qua’shr~’theii’~FIR_.i’ini
No.87/O9 dated 6.6.09 and all. streamers pm;¢d,ingsins PCR i C
No.64/09.
3. In eonineetion the sale of the property in favour of
“*.,the there*~is” said to be civil suit filed by the
responderrts; ~ }X::_e’ording to the petitioners’ Counsel when there
is ref1;sa1_.o~f:tfieitemporary injunction order by the Civil Court
iinfavo1irv.oi° the respondents in order to impiicate the petitioners
harass them a raise complaint has been filed alleging
‘AV
forging of the documents and creating of sale deed in favour of
the petitioners.
4. As per the submission may;ie”a”;priVtate_:<c_ornpIaint«'
filed by the respondents against the petitioneirs he rtiattefisii'
referred under Section police
investigation. So far filed." When the
complaint is filed Aa11egingVV_f_rva'ttd against
the petitionersahdiiiiieiiinazttefhas to the police for
investigatiopni it p the proceedings at this
stage. by the police affects the
petitioners, 'then vth.e3i/Vsicotiid have recourse to law by
' «..apptoaeh§–Iig this Cou1"t—-or' the trial Court.
xggb,/'
5. Since, it is too premature to consider the petition for
quashing the FIR and 3}} further proceedings,
dismissed.
Bkp.