Guddu Quraishi vs The State Of Bihar on 27 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Cr.Misc. No.28232 of 2010
          GUDDU QURAISHI S/O LATE TAZAMMUL QURAISHI
                                Versus
                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                               -----------

4. 27.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner

and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323,

324, 307of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act

and 3/4 Explosive substance Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody

since 8.10.2009 and there is only one other case

pending against him, let the petitioner above named,

be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the

court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection

with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 125/09, subject to

the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of

the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish
2

information to the Court about any change in address

of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking

that he will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails

to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

The fact that there is only one other case

pending against the petitioner shall be verified by the

Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail.

Fahad.                               ( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Leave a Comment Cancel