:14 mm HIS!-I councr on xmmmmxn. AT ammom
DA’i’ED mxs mm 3′” may or my 2003
BE FORE
mm I-§ON’BLE rm. wsrxcz suncaasa B
cammnz nwxsron PETITIQI’ N-:’3~.216:5r2V<un)V"V§3"% :
BETWEEN :
P A SUBEAIAH
510 mm 2 G AIYAPPA
man as amps
am Bonmm VILMGE
Imsmmmm I-IOBLI
smfimngwr ‘:ALnx_j’
KCIDAGU 315231132′
. _FB2’J2’ITIOI~¥E11
EH9
mm srarz or u “rL§arz§;t:a ts’A
V4.23 .1.=,Q:,1cE
:«_m.’:Lm¢:1zI ‘ jz<onp;_u3U
T A . . . nnspoxmmw
11331 §1=;:x: !-fi§i$I2jI1$;?i'1i I-ICGP)
THIS ACRIZMINAL REVISION' PETITION IS FILED
.:4.Ta_2 CR.?.C. BY ME Anvoca-rm FOR THE
«PETEVTIGNER 91-warms mm.' mzs 1-zoN'nz.E CGURT my
133 <.PI.msEn TO nmncr ms: szssxoxs Jams,
—–1{0DAli’:’u-U AT HADIKERI TO RELEASE THE c>RI»:;ImL
nszns Bananas TO mm pmxmzwmn BEARING
Ho.4e7x95-96 mm 498/9.5-96 mam; HA9
REIGISTERBIJ BEFORE THE SUB-REGISTRAR sommmm
WHICI-I ARE IN CASE N|3′.’}.SC.4′?1’99 TO Ti-E INTERIM
CUSTOBY OF THE BETITIfiNER.
Thia .renriain petition is coming on
achtxia :53. on
£03. landing:
GREEK
this day, the Cmnct madew
Third party filed an
cf Cx:.P.C. in 8.6. No.47V}’iL:L9€3_£? f 6z:_
the documsnts on J_.t§ha hfzhiat-, the
documents belong to V’ ‘.
2. The the accused
on the are fake stamp
papara. “filed chaxtgo sheet
and than m§t:«.1: e2: down far trial. The
neither he is the
‘&;r;c..A11 a”e’ciA fly:-::v’«.A.V?§1 r:»z;.u.:e:<:t«e:d with army offenae. The
"'éV'«–éu;é.I=.VV'V:roquirad fax: tho purpose or
'.__ 4t':;§1m§;§:?;i"f$#:h'§:;etween him and ether parties. It
$12E1u3iV'Vfi'ted that that documents were seized
seccsnd accuaad, who is a practicing
arm: the applicant had kept the
documant with than second manned.
3. The Court: bulaw hays rejected the
appliczatien at the petitioner on the
that if the documents are pledged to ‘
same would be tempered and uigo tr.n’rvé’f’..:§_’s~: 35 ii
goasibility at nan rec.-ovary i
4. If than transacting: is a >’Vg§hu’ina
traxzaaction anti the appliéatuit h,au'”-g?;:’tu:”n<$t;1iii1<';
ta dc: with the attenzse,'
be invalidated an thiei stamp
payer. V.a.*.s'"-'.V9fl.uE9""-sfarap papers are
canuernaél, ' the: .g-o on. 33.: fan: am
this tranu4§:i:2t:%ianV' }:_:«aA1._1V-%£'s«:.'s'-;=i*1 the agplicant and the
whul' azsa not accuwad and againat:
Vi4ho:uV"1m_"4u11§:9:'aticn is made, applicant: should
zzaavéifiaieu an apportunity ta produce such
_4m__'_4;:;az;}:e:i;n}. to prove that the transaction is
and the document is required for bone.
yuxpom. In these airmmatances, if
u"iwiI§ex:ty is. given tn» the accused to pzoduae
such material to prove genuineness of 'Eh!!!
mfiay'
transaction it wnuld anrve the punpose of the
petitioner. it is made clear that, if such fig
apylicatian is filed, the trial Court f§ °a
consider tha same on merit and p§§a "."
appropriate cxdaz. With ths3a"~ohsér¢§fiQfih;} H
the xeviaion petition studs dig§§£$d:éf} V:" 'yT
""3 sat'?