Singer India Limited vs Mrs Pushpa Jaganath on 20 August, 2010

1

3: THE men com? 01-" KARHATAKA AT 

mmn 71-33 THE 2:» DAY or Aueufi, 2T:;ii%c'$% T  _ L   .

PRESEEIT  *_ 

TI-IE I-IC)N'BLE naIR>.»,I_'£.)'S'1;'4I€',Ii  Mk  _

THE HOIPBLE  

BETWEEN:     

1 s1NGER;fvIDIAAL1MI1:Ep~««%A%%L % 
(mmgmngxz KIEGWN AS,  * 
SI!I§}EI*?:__S1N;?INCi=.._1£e£.4_;C'iféi33!\IE_CDI%iPAN1'] A
Raexsmasn 0FFI£:EAT A-25x4, 2ND moon
 €'£(Z%~£)PI§RA'I'1VE.V.--fiiDUSTRIAL ESTATE
ZVNEW 31'31J'H*V11<'3 I
REP. BY rsmacmfi

(1335 32-1: magma HALML as Y SHE'ITY,ADV. )

   k1% " "  fizsrma JAGAHATH

X    Wii.'2}Lb\TE PADAM JAGAHNATH
  mgr: ABGUT 70 YEARS

 X 2 u PADAM JAGANHATI-I SANJIVNATI-I

'  S] 0 LATE PADAM JAG-ANNATH

'L  AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

%%  x T}; PADAM JAGANRATH DEEPAKNATI-I

S! O LATE PADAM JAGANNATH
AGED £1' 36 YEARS

ALL ARE RIAT 210.301, PROMENADE PLACE
45/2,PROMENAI1)E ROAD
BANGALGRE-569042

 RESPONDENTS

€/



(By Sri : KAMAL as BI-IANU FOR R2 & R3 )  % f i

TI-{IS RFA man U/3 95 CFC 
JUDGMENT 1Z)ATED:25.2.2010 ,p.as3Et)_ % IN, 

OS.N€).25029l2007 on ma   xrmk mam.
cm CIVII. & SESSIONS JUBGEA, _MA¥oH».LL

BAHGALQRE, PARTLY DECREE__IN(3  "SUIT-2.' 

E..JEc'I*m.N'r,' ARREARS cm-gE.NT,   

ms APPEAL c0M.mc§FL F_QR.}&m§1iIS'.$ 1ON nus
DAY, MAHJUNATH  FQLLGWIEGI

.

of the “sewed their dispute.
to vacate the prexnisea
or; 2011. The appellant has also

damages at the rate of Ra.25,CDO/«- pazu.
of suit an the appellant vacam the

the appellant undertakes to pay the

V. on or befarc 5th of every month. Tim

: has also agreed to pay the arrears of
Rs.10,03,450f- on or before 209* January 2011 and

filrtheragreeathattheappellantvcroufinxatinductarzy
third party and that he would voluntarily vacate and

hand swer pnasesaion of the property to the Respondent
‘V

3

without causim any damage to the

appellant has aha agreed to pay and

eonsumptien charges axfl ”

3..’1’he appellant has
before. this court within t1iisf’ :i:’eeI-{six} the’

abawbwms’ 1 . ._ %

4. The Jegrint and it is
signed Counsel and
The partim are
the mpgcfive

“5, appeal is dkposed of in term

by m::d1fy1ng’. ‘ the decme of the ‘Ii-ml’

Xlfisvlew’ ‘ 0f the settlement a.rrrvad_’ at the instance

‘:21’ the appellant is» entitled fer of full

Sd/-3
JUDGE

5d/-‘-.

JUDGE