High Court Kerala High Court

Baby.M.G vs The District Educational Officer on 24 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Baby.M.G vs The District Educational Officer on 24 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 33778 of 2009(N)


1. BABY.M.G,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

3. P. SWAPNA, UPSA, AUP SCHOOL,

5. THE MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :24/11/2009

 O R D E R
                      T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     W.P.(C) No. 33778 of 2009-N
                   - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009.

                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as UPSA in the school managed by the 4th

respondent. The petitioner entered service on 14.5.1993 and the third

respondent was appointed in the year 1997 as UPSA.

2. During the year 2006-2007 there were five divisions in the school.

But during the staff fixation for the year 2007-2008, one division was

abolished for want of students strength, but the petitioner and the third

respondent were allowed to continue in the school in terms of 1 : 40 ratio.

The petitioner is also relying upon Ext.P2 Govt. Order permitting retention

of teachers in charge of scouts and guides in the same school.

3. The dispute herein relates to the non-consideration of Exts.P4 and

P5 by the authorities. The staff fixation for this year is evident from

Ext.P3, whereby one division is reduced. In these circumstances, the

petitioner has approached the District Educational Officer by Ext.P5,

seeking her retention in the school. The same was directed to be forwarded

to the Deputy Director of Education through the Manager as per Ext.P6

communication by the District Educational Officer. It is averred by the

wpc 33778/2009 2

petitioner that already the same stands forwarded to the Deputy Director of

Education.

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

that unless the Deputy Director is not taking a decision immediately, that

may put the petitioner to difficulties. Therefore, there will be a direction to

the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P5, within a period of one

month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the

petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. Meanwhile, any proposal to deploy the

teachers, will be kept in abeyance till a decision is taken.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

kav/