High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Jayarathnamma vs Sri Rudraiah on 21 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Smt Jayarathnamma vs Sri Rudraiah on 21 January, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
 

:2
E
x
.5
Q
2
X
§
-&
3
§
3
3
J
z
E
2
E
§
:
Z
3
5
L.
3
2
3
1%
3
§

uulvnluum ww»-wuwmu -can m\r'v.m\n\'ar'&u#"\et\:£'"'A

$9 fig mm mam $25 xafigéamm gr §a::GAa§:§§:Lk  
mist: ms 'rm 22%? my Q? gawam€é3%:§A%% % J?    
mew     %%   
$13 E-I§H'ELE am. mgmsz 
war: ysmm: Z'¥$§3E%;:::_f   A
EEWEEH: J %  A   
3%: Jfigarathnamma, V '" * "

$55 $5 Rudraiah,
Pagfi aabaut 5'? 

 23,: 9f ;séa"%%  érzfifiéa  if  AA 
Kyéanaha §'§$;§$i§,l'  "  V"  ' '

R 4! * . 

      %§m@§EE

   

gay    

   

      

 ' §:§.,§;.}j;:;ez%,*aa%§*w§;a§
k~%§2%a3xe2:i%  yfim

    
Xyfiafiifiha 

 
     

  ¥§ri'%£ ?$§;i£iafi £3 gm mafia?  23$ 

  %%%%:m at? am fimrisiiiutiezz fif Mia with 3. §r&3:£:£ 2% qjazaah

 fijafiraiar ziamfi @'5?2E?;.2{1'é% ix: Ex.§::s.2§i 2:33'?
§&$fi®fi 'fig fig Eimffiéa

     

kamnmaum. rum nan/n



 

F
E
F
I
F
.

n
.

E
.

IRIIUII Iu\l’UtI-nu urn

WWMW WnKW3f”v#3’»53 EQWQ ‘ .
W” m*”””w”””«’N””*& FN|i5″WW’£? ‘%au”‘c::$V’_,%-:9’*V’5W:.% W3 fiwwmawrmmxmxuwa awmmwvm “h.«’M|”*h?l<ti vs I€\l'lf\l'l"1Ifl"'I«!Vfl"'h

Tm 253$: ?e£i:i$:'; wmkag at: firs»?
hming aha Saar': mafia tzhg

@333

mg gatitimfifi is a éacrm

amfame a far
huafiafié -« gufigamant dehter.
d;;ehmr was ms: inta gmfii '$1: fiays
mm? Tim — ¥:;::;r1t,i:11mvz:i is
%§az23;,t.§ €138 cf an
mm: Q Gmzrt Em
fiurgéaae waufi fie garwd by

aaizégirzg in pgisfin ya. mafia

__. 3.5; %m, '£3 mafi flag: the yeiifiergw weuié

'aim judgmant éfikfia? m aixrfi gisan yet

wiaazi Em had spam tm éays wfi

– §§ a §fi;”1″§ $ta€.e mi’

_.uCfi– fsfl ur3_.!..=.J:1..id 1:4… .14 I…

sd/-g
IUGE

‘=%
hfiwmw as gimmzfi is fixmfififi Witii. this imywnaaé $r*s :2: §._::§_§ .3 mange xfix §fi.§m§ ma $33 xfi