High Court Kerala High Court

Achummantakath Shahul Hameed vs State Of Kerala on 23 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
Achummantakath Shahul Hameed vs State Of Kerala on 23 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 2827 of 2010()


1. ACHUMMANTAKATH SHAHUL HAMEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. S.V.MAHAMOOD, S/O.ABDULLA,

3. AYISHA, W/O.MAHAMOOD,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL

                For Respondent  :SRI.NISHIL.P.S.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :23/07/2010

 O R D E R
                       V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                   = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                    Crl.M.C..No.2827 of 2010
                  = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
              Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2010

                              ORDER

Petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.127/1995 of

Payangadi Police Station for offences punishable under Sections

143,147,148,448,427,323 and 324 read with 149 IPC and now

pending before the J.F.C.M, Payyanur as L.P.C.No.132/2003

seeks to quash the proceedings against him on the ground that

the matter has been settled between him and the de facto

complainant and another injured as evidenced by Annexures 3

and 4 affidavits by the two injured persons.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the de facto

complainant and the other injured person also admitted that the

matter has been settled between the parties. Since offences

punishable under Sections 448, 427, 323 and 324 IPC are

compoundable (Section 324 IPC being compoundable on the date

of commission of the offence), the said composition is accepted

and the petitioner shall stand discharged of those offences.

In the light of the composition of the offences punishable

Crl. M.C. No.2827 of 2010
2

under Section 448,427,323 and 324 IPC, the rest of the offences

punishable under Sections 143,147 and 148 cannot survive

because unlawful assembly allegedly formed was for the purpose

of committing the aforementioned offences which have been

compounded. Accordingly the petitioner is discharged of the

offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148 and 149 IPC.

The result of the foregoing discussion is that L.P.C.No.132

of 2003 on the file of J.F.C.M, Payyannur, so far as it relates to

the petitioner shall stand quashed.

Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2010.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

sj