M/S Kshema Drug Distributors vs State Of Karnataka on 25 August, 2009

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

DRUGS INSPECTOR

DHARWAD DIST  I 
OFFICE OF THE ASST DRUGS CONTROLLER...  j

OLD INCOME TAX OFFICE ROAD ' ' ~ "
VIDYANAGAR

HUBLI 580023..  %% I_"EiNTg  I

(BY SRI P.H. GOTKHINDI, HCGP)

CRL.P FILED U/S. 482 OFT-CR._P}C} SYAITHEPETITIONERS
PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE_COUR_T; M'A~Y"BE-.-"PLEASED TO
QUASH THE CRIMINAL.PR.OCE'EDIi\iGS_ I'i\.iIT_IATE«D AGAINST THE
PETITIONER IN c.c.t1\io;;927/I993'ONTHE FILE or THE IMFC 1
COURT, HUBLI.        

THIS PETI-T1051'"COiVi¥IDJ.G"*O!\I.VFORHEARING THIS DAY,}THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLQyV'ING:_ 1  

 The petiti'o:i1e'rS__are oeiiore this Court seeking for quashing

 the cri::<1i:nwa!VVpi=o'cTeveoi'I:gi.S initiated against the petitioner in CC.

 i'\}"o.'927/99 toeneineoetore the JMEC I Court, Hubii.

  I 'i'Acco'rding to the petitioners, respondent fiied a

myjfeemeiai.iii aiiieging violation of the provisions of S.27(a) of the

‘.’uV’.jDVrug’s:VVan’d Cosmetics Act, 1940. Application for discharge was

Alb”

transaction was during Jufy and September, 1996 prior t_o.___the

issuance of a direction by the Supreme Court to the

to compuisorily obtain ficence which does not amountito h

of S.27A and 17c of the Act, this peti.ti»on._is aiiioym. it

proceedings initiated against the petitioners

Court, Hubli, in C.C. No.92?/1999, isi.hVer.ebyAcjuasheti’-.1

fVJUDGE

sac*