C.K.Thomas vs The Circle Inspector Of Police on 24 April, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8326 of 2009(I)


1. C.K.THOMAS,AGED 57 YEARS,S/O.KURIYAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KULATHUPUZHA

3. THE ASST.LABOUR OFFICER,PUNALUR OFFICE

4. INTUC KULATHUPUZHA UNIT, REPRESENTED BY

5. CITU KULATHUPUZHA UNIT, REPRESENTED BY

6. AITUC KULATHUPUZHA UNIT,REPRESENTED BY

7. KCJ(J)KULATHUPUZHA UNIT,REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN

 Dated :24/04/2009

 O R D E R
            V.K.MOHANAN & P.N.RAVINDRAN,JJ
               ---------------------------------------------
                   W.P(C).No. 8326 of 2009
               ---------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 24th day of April, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Mohanan,J:

This writ petition is preferred seeking for a

direction to respondents 1 and 2 to afford adequate police

protection to the petitioner and the contractor’s workers from

respondents 4 to 7 for the construction work including loading

and unloading work.

2. Government Pleader appears for respondents 1

to 3. Pursuant to the notice issued, respondents 4 to 7

entered appearance. We have heard the matter.

3. The learned Government Pleader submits that

there is no law and order situation at all. The above

submission made by the learned Government Pleader is not

controverted. On the basis of the submission made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for respondents

4 to 7, it appears that the main dispute is with respect to the

wage regarding the work carrying on in the establishment of

the petitioner. If that be so, this writ petition can be disposed

of relegating the parties to approach the third respondent,

WP(C) NO.8326 OF 2009

:-2-:

who in turn, shall convene the conciliation meeting and explore

the possibility to settle the matter. Either the petitioner or

respondents 4 to 7 can approach the third respondent. On such

filing a petition, the third respondent is directed to convene a

conciliation meeting of the parties concerned and to find out the

possibility of settlement of the dispute regarding the wages.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.K.Mohanan,
Judge.

P.N.Ravindran,
Judge.

MBS/

WP(C) NO.8326 OF 2009

:-3-:

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
V.K.MOHANAN, JJ.

——————————————–

M.A.C.A.NO. OF 200

——————————————–

J U D G M E N T

WP(C) NO.8326 OF 2009

:-4-:

DATED: -1-2009