High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajinder Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 March, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Rajinder Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 March, 2009
      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh


                        Criminal Misc. No.M- 7480 of 2009 (O&M)
                        Date of decision: 20.3.2009


Rajinder Kaur and others

                                                     ......Petitioners

                        Versus



State of Punjab and another

                                                   .......Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA


Present:   Mr.Amit Dhawan, Advocate,
           for the petitioners.


                 ****


SABINA, J.

Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of order dated

17.1.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Malerkotla

(Annexure P-2) in the light of compromise/affidavit (Annexure P-7).

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the

petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders vide impugned order

dated 17.1.2007 by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Malerkotla in

the FIR lodged by respondent No.2. Now the parties have arrived at

a compromise with the intervention of the relatives and respectables
Criminal Misc. No.M- 7480 of 2009 (O&M) -2-

of the area. As per the compromise/affidavit (Annexure P-7),

respondent No.2 has decided to join the matrimonial home along with

her husband-petitioner No.3 at Holland.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of Court, Ms.Ravinder Kaur Nihalsinghwala,

Sr.DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1,

whereas, Mr.A.P.Kaushal Advocate accepts notice on behalf of

respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed

reply/affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2, who is also present in

Court, wherein the factum of compromise effected between the

parties vide Annexure P-7 is admitted. It is also mentioned in the

reply/affidavit of respondent No.2, that now she will reside with her

husband and she has no objection in case the impugned order in

question is ordered to be quashed.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. The

impugned order dated 17.1.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ist

Class, Malerkotla (Annexure P-2), whereby the petitioners were

declared proclaimed offenders, is quashed.

The petitioners are directed to surrender before the trial

Court on or before 20.4.2009.

(SABINA)
JUDGE
March 20, 2009
anita