Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka Education Society … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 July, 2009
.
.E..
% IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA,
DATED Ti~:I'IS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY,'V_A'20O~§3fl T
Bgvokaf
THE I-IC>N*BLE M'R.JUS'FiC.E R.A1\«1_Vixrir3HA,I~iR§:;;$DS§;'
WRIT PE'TI'I'ION No.20 1'?5%V..#{j1a'%2o:5%'2'- ~{:;B:BI\;iP)
BETWEEN
REGD OFFICE 'AT 9:2; "
2ND MAIN, L':-RDjB,LOCK 4'
3R3?) S'I'A_(3r_E, Bgsaisigsiiwskai-eA(3A.R
BANGAf.'.ORE' :,f.e_soo"i.%f9' _ ' _
REP BY¥i'I'S,SECRv§§'!'AE;2Y"'~._ ' -
SR1 M MP=NJUNA*i'H'.v _ __
THE KARNA1'Az:A'?i:bLIcATIx3ré: st2r§i'§1"x*----(:§EGD)
PETITIONER
(By 3;: ': 13 L $Am_EEv', ADV. )
1'; "THE &>"i§ff&TiE:3 op KARNATAKA
'~-REP" i3Yj§'l'S SECREFARY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
M33, 'BUILEJING DR AMBEDKAR VEEDRI
" * BANGALORE «- 560001.
. Q-I BRUHAT' BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALSKE
NR. SQUARE CORPORATION OFWCES
BANGALORE - 560002
REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER ;
I "[1
pi)
-2-
3 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (WEST)
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PA--Lm'§:f '--' "' '
SESHADRIPURAM
BANGALORE -= 560020.
4 THE ASSISTANT REVENUE QFFECEQR '
(MALLESHWARAM) - =
BRUHAT BANGALORENEAHANAGARA PALLKE
16TH (moss
VYALIKAVAL F'
BANGALORE - 560003. .
5 THE PRESIDENT '
BHARATIYA .JANATri-AP-ARTY _ .-
KARNA'1'AKAv UNrr"(N~EA3R SWATHI)
SESHAL)R§.PURAi''a: :: * ;
BAN GAL._0R;:_a:4-550 02:2»,
V. Rsspomasrsrrs
(By 3;; §té';'z)E§%pA§:;V.j§%0R R"'i'
W S,'u'IS}i'c'?:'A.N1';'I'l4i~.A.E"}f;'4}'S FOR R2 TO 4
SR1.K+.N.P!JfI"I'i:}GGXE{D.A; ADV. FOR R-2 TO 4)
Tmé WRIT .I§1::'rm»c)r&%'1s FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 22'; OF 'THE COl\"éS'I'ITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TC)
QUAS£H§'If}i£+} END'OR--S}§;'MENT DT. 18.6.2007 ISSUED BY R3
VIBE ANNE_X;H. AND THE ORDER DT. 22.6.2003?' PASSED
':1*VzJAv1_E'E_'A;§:':~z,§',x.J.
H."'w%*rI~:1s"«"Effi'}?:'iT10N CGMING ON FOR PRLJ-IEARING (B-
GRG.UP),fl"HIS DAY, THE coum' MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORBER
A ?I'11e git-L-vanoe of the petitioner is over the gent of
V% of immovable property by the Bruhat Banglore
" V Mahanagara Paiike (BBMP), in favour of the 5m
-3-
respondent, by order dt. 22.6.2007 Armexure-pl,
the endorsement dt. 18.6.2007
to grant lease of the very same lafid ‘V
2. Learned counsel for. subiiiifi L.
Public Interest Litigation in in
question the order ..V;’;;’A”faxfo11r”AeViA; the 5m
respondent was A ::.b3.’zfi 1 . 3.2009. if
that is so, theifi :Afii.11exuz’e~J cannot
S’L1I’ViVe..~ “”” lei; the etxiersemaat
3 the the writ petition is, acctrdingly
sax»
Iudge