Karnataka High Court
Neelakanta Rao vs Ningegowda on 3 June, 2011
I . we mg; men coum' Of? 1<:;xRNA'::<x}fJL1:":R§ 1' ' " " THE: HC*N'BLE ME{.{}US'1'ICE 2i HAN " 2c:2 : T' BEITWEEN: V' ' NEEZLAVKANTA RAG, ~ ._ , 1, ; 3,/0 LATE NARAYANA RA-lo, ' AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS'.~-.1" ; 'V OCC: HEA£):.M>§S':FERL:_GEES, , Lo1~:AsARAf~--.z1L:¥;AG1§, M;»;NGALA'~pos*1*';' KQ'I'HATI=i'H Hs:>B'L':',''--.._ , " _ M. MANYDA '1"~'AL'~{.& mE;.TR.:'cir. " «««« ,..PE'I'ITIONE:R {By Sh K; A CH2%§£'£}E{A$£'V¥_EE{ARA, ADV.) N1NGE:Gom3A.V S/egg; LATE: GE,N_:jE:GC§w13A. 1's.'iAz}C'R gas? A<}'EI§§ ---- ~ * " A :35, <3m_CROss$ ' ,.<:",<<3 amK%.smvAmN<:;A1AH*s HOUSE, A1}«?KAN;9{FP1E2SE'1KVARA NILAYA. " C§*E}X1\/Ii} Mtg}'€;51~1WARANAe 'FHE:- EQLLQWING; , _ ; ORQEE ._ V" _ When the matter gviiteunsel for the petitiener amount has been paid by and therefore the in support of the abeegg eounsei filed an applfieeiioei and (8) of the Cr.P.C 1'/'W h 'V I;;e:»;rr1eci Counsel Srifiirisagar has; filed respondent and admits the receipt: ef
” VVe:i’}::3:je’~:;'”zimeunt by the eenaplainanii, The
e<§;np§e:i:i'eim§: is else preeeni: before the (fear? and
eeimiie having received the entire amount ef R35
(Rupees five 1ai<;h$}§
/-~.
E
=./’
~.
3
3, in \+’i€\’v’ of the above d€vs?}opmen;: 7.aj:g1,
GVGY1 béaforés the triai Court an apphczxtimi hg;v’:12g’~h%:é:§f
filed <31"; 30.5.11 sthextiing/; that: the 21zn_:.2§1.fi_”=haS.:”b.ecn’ ”
paid by the a<:cus€d to _¢€:§m"pléLi:121._riéi..1*”*C_iOsh:11’€19’fAi:¢E*1e:’
in my view, the matter has pL1t€m ‘end téjin View
of the setilemant bsfziveen _;n is set aside
and the___ .;1cquii£éd:”}éihd he shall be
re}eaVs__<~:_d; be: informed to the
jail g.;uthQfiii£:9_jfhmedia§ely,_'
Séjaé
$33333
. E:?'"_\='1'\:A