IN THE HIGH COURT GF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT BHARWAD
mrrea 11415 THE 19?" DAY or F€8RUARY§. ?2@A./ji' T T
BEFORE
me HON*BLE MRJUSTICE M+:3 H~.A__N séiafirawgsrguukaé
way PETITION No.e1y1%24x2oo9iAémc)
BETWEEN: 'A "
M/s. SK.
By its P'IOP1TiC3:T,OI'.:' » :
Srinivas ;I;_(c_}111_1i:1::" "
Aged 57 Bixsinésé _
Rfo. Sunjbafis -R5§li ';x{i1;rg ' '
Belgaum I )ist.. . .. PEFITIONER
(By Sri B1.v.S5map1;;,',--_Ad§.,)
Lk%.1; 71'VI:ieVD5;I1§:t:t(i"i,1CtE'. Marketing
" V. Committee, Ramdurg
Bfilgaum Dist. .. RESPONDENTS
. f3_YESmt.Vidya Vati, HCGP for R1
Sri Mallikaxjun Cfiasareddy, Adv., for R2
-3-
This Writ; petition is filed under Arfieies 226 and :2;;i:7e of
the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugwed
oxder dated 7.12.2008 vfie Annexure-A passed };2y_"t§1.e' V.
respondent, etc.
) This writ petitierz coming on fey '4 " = u
this day the Court made the following:- "
oRnEefle% %
The petitioner is aflottedeite byirespohéeafi-}APzQ1c,
R-amdurg, for the purpese Vshejp-~cun3e..
godown for its businese' yard on
iease~--cum--sale ;=._T11e--.v~eop3:%" fife. lease-cum-sale
ageement the writ petition.
2. "I'71_1e_ ageement entered into
between the reveal that the aliottee shall
V. s110;;§$*ithiI3 one year form. the date of
a31c:>t'1__11en£§"~~ f.['V'v~*e"Hewever, if certain unforeseen
_ inteivene, the APMC shall extend the
H H " _'for"c¢onstrL1ction for .2: further period of one year.
petitioner who is the allottee of the site did 33.0%:
'T " eehstruet the shop during the stipulated period, the
3/'
-3-
erder reiating to ferfeiture is issued agajnst~"'--~.th.e
petitioner. Such order of forfeiture is questiortecf 3
Writ petition.
3. Sri. Somapur, learned
behalf of the petitioner sub1?e;TVit_itepi tfiat = V L'
did not construct the RCC
on the business on the yr up shed
because of paueity of that the
inaction. --- t--o:t1T'~tf1e':'1 of A' the... vioefitioner is neither
intentiefi_a1" is 130113 fide under the
facts and the cases. That, if petitioner
v is e_i_ght"ir1es.r..tl*1s' time to construct the buflding,
.:x£fou1ci._:beV"v<§6:zet111ct1'ng the building after obtaining
sai;efleneii'.§;é1;§iiVfmm the respoI1<1eI1t-AP'MC.
.. petition is opposed by Sri Malliakxjun C.
learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
VT by filing statement of objections and the learned
,
.
/7
.4-
Government Advocate by eemending that no leniezgeey
can be shown to the petitie-ner, inasmuch ‘Vie
petitioner has violated the clause contamefi ” ”
ageement entered into between the ‘petitiQI;:e’1§”.é;t_1(V1: the
APMC and consequently the orde»f”1fe1ahA.”ngpte_”fe~rfei.hei:~’enV’:
is legal and justified under thejf3,cts
cf the cases.
5. It is I”1()Tf}’s}1__ dispI1te:fthéat.”»theVypeititiexaer has not
eonst11;:tte”d*-the of one year or at
ieast yeaifsifeas in the lease-cum–~ sale
agreement ei?¢te’z”ed;_i;11:o Vhemeen the parties. Hewever,
V’ “the ‘-hetiziionegr hes”‘aiready started its business on the
sifeflixge by putting up temporary shed. The
pefit.ihI1er.is’ Epéltyixxg market C€SS also. Having regard to
it is clear that the pefifiener does not have
A e:.’*£;ifIe.,_i;ft9:teI1tien to aiienate the property allotted to it ta
party. Having regard to the totaiity and facts and
” circumstance 0f the cases, this Court is of the opinien
S/5
-5.
that interest at’ justice will be met. if the §€tfi”,i{)I1i”-3-{_’_ is
granted eight months’ time to construct the ..
prayed for. Accordingly, the following order
The forfeiture erder/notice
this writ petition is kept in ab_e3€§1ncf§’fof’ a V
momihs from this date, flake an
appficafion for sa11cti<V)r1 xE:f 'the: shop to be
constructed in the_ sit1:AA'a1ieVt@:-':£i 3 period of
five = ' vraispondents-aumoI'fl:ies
shall coi1_siii_er' filed by the petitioner for
sanctioning i:1A';:2.cc-firdance with Law Within five
– weezgsk :::;%¢mafaer;k petitioner shall construct the
” v0f;~v.:_:t:’91e~ ésiige allotted to it as expeditiously as
pdssifiie later than the outer limit of six months
‘frem the: fiiate of conamtmication of the sanctioned pian.
‘i$ “:I1adC clear that if the entire exercise is not
K : c;o§g’:i:2plete(1 Within a periocl of nine months, the
~ . ()réer/ notice impugned in this writ petition relating to
1/7
-5-
forfeiture revives automaticaliy and the site ,,
forfeited by the APMC. It is made clear
enurss to the benefit of the petitio’;’ié£*’O;11y;–x. -3 ” ‘«
Writ petition is cf