Gujarat High Court High Court

Mahendra vs Municipal on 7 October, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Mahendra vs Municipal on 7 October, 2008
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/882420/2000	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8824 of 2000
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
 
 
=========================================================

 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================

 

MAHENDRA
V SAMPAT - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

MUNICIPAL
COMMISSIONER & 4 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
DR KACHHAVAH for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR
HS MUNSHAW for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
DS
AFF.NOT FILED (R) for
Respondent(s) : 2, 
MR
SHIVANG SHUKLA AGP for
Respondent(s) :
3, 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

	  
Date : 07/10/2008 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

1.0. The
petitioner by way of this petition has prayed to quash and set aside
the conditions imposed by the Bhavangar Municipal Corporation while
appointing the petitioner.

2.0. When
the matter is called on for hearing, the learned counsel for the
petitioner is not present. By efflux of time, the petition has become
infrutuous. Hence, Rule is discharged. Ad-interim relief stands
vacated. It will be open for the petitioner to revive this petition
within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.

3.0. The
office is directed to sent the writ of this order to the petitioner
forthwith.

[K.S.

JHAVERI, J.]

/phalguni/

   

Top