Satyappa vs Ambanna on 12 February, 2009

fa-mi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT I)H.ARWAD

DA'£'ED mxs TI-IE 12¢: ms' or mnmxamr, 213:9  '"' 

BEFORE   -

Tm: HoN*BLE MR JUSTICE MoHAfiA:$H;§gNTAz€AG_:c:j,n..m'%_L;:._f'-1

REVIEW Pr:T1Tzoiu§e,29O]    
WRIT PE'rrrIo_1\I No.e}.:;..'z97/2oo4(LR;v»--.. 

amwmw: __
SATYAPPA, S/O SABU' MADMAL' 3;

AGES AB()U'1'68 3!-;::;~_~'_;2s,  3:   A ' 
R/ATARTHAHAL,TQ.;1A'FHANE;_ 'V  .

DISTBELGAUM.    

PETITIONER

(3? SF-2%. xv:12U*rvL}2x:.jA*é'*<:§p;:'9;-- :%.AN--v'.:)

AND:

1. AMBANNA, $3.0 RAMAPRA iE§§£APUR,
Aem mow'? 55 YEARS,

 V. Q_ R/A_";":'BI-J3I&?§AGI,  AN.D'SiT. BIJAPURE,

.30"

S'f'A'I'_E QFKARNATAKA,

 m:PA:%iT*:x:i§;;N*;* O?1'_REVENUE,
V:m«1_4%NA' S€31}_B~H.A, BANGALORE,
HER BY 1'1_flsE€::~21«:T;«s.RY

 3; . 'THE fiANi3«TRIEUNAL,
  JAMKHAi:~l--DI, BY ITS CHAIRMA.N.

4:  4, "i¥Ar¥Ai§£ANrHAPpA,

.  3;'-0 BHEMAPPA KAWATEKAR,
AGED ABOUT *2? YEARS,

  MAT GADYAL, TQ. JAMKHANDI,

"  ms? BAGALKOTE.



' _ RULE" L

 'QRDER/»ii};3GMEN'T Arm mzcmzg mran Q?/G?/2605 pgssw
 .  V1w..wL.p.Ncmzvgvggooagm) cm mg Rim 0? THE HONBLE HIGH
xsgugqi ma KARNATAKA, gamaaaom

BASAPPA KAWATEKAR',

AGED AEGUT 49 YEARS,

R/AT GAQY&L§ TQA JAMKHAMDI,
BEST QAGALKGTE.

Q3

6. RAMAPPA DAWALAPUR,
AGED AEOUT 4:"; YEARS,
mg'? GADYAL, '1"'Q. JAIVIKHANDE,
D13'? BAGALKOTE.

?. MALLA?PA DAWALAPUR,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
RfA'I' GADYAL, TQ. JMAKHANDI,
ms'? BAGALKOTE,  _

8. RfiMAPP'A DAWALAPUR,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

R.A'I" GADYAL,TQ.JAVM1I{HAND'I;" *  V

DIST BAGALKOTE.   _

9' MAHADEV, szosmu Mgvbiaaig, 
mama ABOU'{"65_YE1':;RS,'=. A %

R/ATARTHAHA;1,fi*Q. 2=§TP§AN§',   

DIST BELc;Amy1,1*';jV_V_'--.w' ~  

1s. r~4z:.L11<AR;;r;;:s:2i,_{ :;=;~:;0 "s;A:3i§vvVLMa::;§§<3A§,,

AGED '1~'&BO_¥i}"?-' 58'%1::AR'3, 
R/AT' ARTH§.E4_AL_3, 'f'Q. A.fr}~:.;§NI_, _'

DISTBELGAUM; .j-~ '  _

: 1.HANUMm§TE££x, 5,: O 'SP;BL}{=htE;%Ef}EGAL,
may ABOUT 's4y.EA¥2s., 
1¢:,(.;x'1* .£:RTHAi4'fAL, TQ. ATHANE,
r?'IS*:' BEL<:f:AuM."  11111 ~ "

  é*,R:.::«:g;LL1x;é;i2.;uN 3. MASALI, mg Rm 1,

'..RESF'QN§EN'E'S

ADV}

" "*rH:s. Fé§f.*é:Ew PETITEGN ES FELEQ UNDER 02931? 4?

8197' C93 PRAYING FOR REVIEW CF THE



THIS REVIEW PETITION COMENG {EN FOR €f3RDERS,_ THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 

ORDER

No grolrznszis are made out to review the’.”:c:§rc1e:rj V’

0?/0?/2005 passed by this sum. « ” §¢£i:§m;., V’

No.41797/2004.

Hence, Review Petition is.d’i5misséé,_

kmv