High Court Kerala High Court

C.S.Ramakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
C.S.Ramakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 11160 of 2009(L)


1. C.S.RAMAKRISHNAN, DRAFTSMAN MECHANICAL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. CONVENOR, DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION

3. SENIOR JOINT DIRECTOR

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.PAREETH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :02/06/2009

 O R D E R
                     T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                        W.P.(C). No.11160/2009-L
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

The petitioner herein is working as Draftsman Mechanical (Gr-I) in

the Technical High School, Palakkad. The main prayer in the writ petition

is for a direction commanding the third respondent to appoint the petitioner

to the post of Lecturer or equated categories on the basis of Ext.P1 Special

Rules and Exts.P2 and P3 Government Orders forthwith.

2. The particulars regarding the petitioner show that he entered

service as Workshop Attender on 16/06/1983, and he was promoted as

Workshop Instructor on 23/01/1989. He is having First Class Diploma in

Mechanical Engineering and was entitled to be promoted as Lecturer or

equated posts as per the unamended Special Rules which was issued as per

G.O.(MS).No.284 dated 02/09/1967. Even though an amendment was

introduced, the rights of persons like the petitioner who entered service

prior to 23/09/1984 are protected by clause 5 of the Kerala Technical

Education Service (Amendment) Rules, 1989 (Ext.P1). The petitioner has

already filed Ext.P8 representation in the matter requesting for redressal of

his grievances. It is pointed out therein that many of his juniors have been

W.P.(C). No.11160/2009
-:2:-

promoted to the post of Lecturer only because they acquired B-Tech

qualification. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no

orders have been passed on Ext.P8 even though it was forwarded through

proper channel.

3. In the light of the contentions raised by the petitioner in Ext.P8

and in this writ petition, there will be a direction to the first respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 after hearing the petitioner within a

period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

The petitioner will forward a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of

the judgment to the first respondent for compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms