High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mantosh Roy & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 6 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Mantosh Roy & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 6 September, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.26058 of 2011
                     1. Mantosh Roy son of Baji Lal Roy
                     2. Santi Devi @ Satani Devi wife of Reji Lal Roy
                     3. Reji Lal Roy son of Late Pritam Roy
                                                Versus
                                       The State Of Bihar
                                              -----------

2. 6.9.2011 Mr. Ratnakar Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioners

is permitted to withdraw the application filed on behalf of

petitioner no.1 without prejudice to his case.

Application for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 is

dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

State.

The petitioner nos.2 and 3 are apprehending their

arrest in a case registered under Sections 493, 376, 504 and

506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the petitioner nos.2 and 3 are

parents of petitioner no.1 and there is no allegation that they

had mislead the victim in any manner, let the petitioner nos.2

and 3 above named be released on anticipatory bail in the

event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below

within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with

Laukahi P.S. case No.41 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of

Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur,

Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also
-2-

conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of

the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as

to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about any

change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioners

will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers

on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and

if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well

represented on each date if they fail to do so on two

consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )