IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 30368 of 2009(M)
1. RADHA RAJAPPAN,W/O.LATE RAJAPPAN,
... Petitioner
2. ARYA RAJAPPAN,D/O.LATE RAJAPPAN,
3. SACHU RAJAPPAN,S/O.LATE RAJAPPAN,
Vs
1. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,OFFICE OF THE
... Respondent
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,MINOR IRRIGATION
3. A.K.OMANA,SASTHAMPARAMBIL,NADUVILE MURI,
4. HONEY RAJ,SASTHAMPARAMBIL,NADUVILE MURI,
For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB P.ALEX
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :27/10/2009
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
-------------------------
W.P.(C.) No.30368 of 2009
---------------------------------
Dated, this the 27th day of October, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The 1st petitioner claims to be the wife of late Shri.Rajappan
V.N., who was a 1st grade Draftsman in the Office of the 2nd
respondent. Petitioners 2 & 3 claim to be their children. It is stated
that Shri.Rajappan expired on 24/08/1999, and what the petitioners
now claim is a share in the family pension that is due to the family
of the deceased. Although, they are also claiming DCRG i.e. due to
him, having regard to the fact that the disbursement of the DCRG is
based on the nomination made by the deceased, if the petitioners
are entitled, they will have to work out their remedies before
appropriate forum.
2. In so far as family pension is concerned, it is seen that
the petitioners are filed Ext.P6 representation before the 1st
respondent, with copy of the 2nd respondent. Therefore, it is only
appropriate that the 2nd respondent considers Ext.P6 representation
and pass orders thereon. This shall be done by the 2nd respondent
WP(C) No.30368/2009
-2-
as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of
production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ
petition.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg