IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 22181 of 2008(N)
1. PRAKASHAN, S/O. VELAYUDHAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. ADAT GRAMA PANCHAYATH
... Respondent
2. SAJEEVAN @ SASIDHARAN,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1)
For Respondent :SRI.T.A.RAJAGOPALAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :26/08/2008
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) 22181 of 2008
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated: AUGUST 26, 2008
JUDGMENT
The direction sought for in this writ petition is for the
implementation of Ext.P3, by which the 2nd respondent was
directed by the 1st respondent Panchayat to rectify the
defects in a smoke house.
2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the
Panchayat now submits that they have already issued a stop
memo to the 2nd respondent and that as at present, the
smoke house is not functioning.
3. Though this submission of the learned standing
counsel that the smoke house is not functioning, is disputed
by the petitioner, still having regard to the fact that the stop
memo has been issued, it is the responsibility of the
Panchayat, to ensure its compliance. If at all the 2nd
respondent, the operator of the smoke house, has any
grievance about the stop memo, it is upto him to pursue the
WP(C) 22181 of 2008
2
matter in the manner known to law.
4. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing
that the Panchayat shall ensure that the stop memo, which
they have issued, is implemented and that the same is
complied with.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
mt/-