RFA NO.3'§2 OF 200}
IN1?HEHKH{COURTTNTKARNATAKA,BANGALORE
DATED THIS ON THE 08'!" DAY OF SEPTEMBER'*2Q{39--VV
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LTNARAYANA"éV.7 ""p '.V
RFA N0. 312 o§»A:2oq;. 3
BENNEEN
g 2V
‘ SON OF LATE NALLAPPA
SR1 K.M MARAPPA _
SON OF MUN1YAPP.A-._ % % ” .
AGED ABOUT41YEARs,
RESIDING AT KARPUR ‘V1LL_A(}E-;”~~. ‘ ..
ANEKALTALLJK, A 1.. ”
BANGALORE ‘DISTRICT? A” ‘ _
NOW
-NO319, “K£§RNP£f1’P.E{A.}IOUSING BOARD COLONY,
KORAL/LANOA: ;A,LAY’OU’T,’ A
BANGALORE 560; 03¢ ”
” A Q …APPELLANT
(By SR1: SIS.ID’DAPP-A, ADVOCATE}
IifHI§;d:na2N{KA, MAJOR
“WIFE OFTIATE NALLAPPA
K.fLRI:’E~}HNAPPA, MAJOR
A’ SQN OF LATE NALLAPPA
MUNIYAPPA, MAJOR
A
3 RFA NO.3l2OF20€)1
ALLARE RESIDING OF
MANGAMMANAPALYA,
BEGURU HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK V’ ”
RESRONDENTS _
(By SR1 G.MANIVANNAN, ADVOCATE FOR.R1&3)”‘ A «
REA FILED U/O. 41 R 1 SEC. 96″O’P’. Ciéc E,AGA;’£NST«’Ti+:E
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 8.2.2_00,1ARAS’SED”TN”O;S:NO.
3627/86 BY THE XXIV ADDL. ‘.__C’1″.I_’Y CIVIL ‘~JUDCrE–..
BANGALORE CITY, DISMTSSTNC THE FOR”
DECLARATION, POSSESSION;”g”MESNE.__ “PROFITS AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS REA COMING =ON_FOR;_ THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE EOELLOWTNQ; ‘ f
J1: DG C1\%r;.CM1«__:”_N_E =
This ease wa’SA:_:’.e9;11e'(;i«. =”thz’:iCe, none appeared and
thereforepasseéd Over; A: [.00 p.111. again, matter was Called
*V.Vr1O’I1A-3, appeared”;
“T1*1erefO’re;_ dismissed for nomprosecution.
Sd/’
TUDGE