Bota Coffe Curing Works vs The Managing Director on 3 August, 2009

1:: ma me:-1 coon? or xaxzxmrrmm AT   " 

DATED TI-H8 THE am on or AUGUB1f_2L\§9  VA '% "  '

PRESENT 

mm 1-mrrnm HR. 9.13. n1nA_xAnAx, €:;x1n§' 

THE nomsm mR.gusr:e3 "f_s.né.;s.An:£Aii:'zV*~ 
wnrr APPEAL mi". 251 

BETWEEN:

Beta Coffee C'uring"%Vorl{e;VV. " . . 
Girgur Vfllage,  'I'a1iik.»_ M %
Mysore District.' V ' Q %   
Represented by Sri S.'Md. -«Zaiie*3_r;'« 
So1:1ofM.Sayeed»._4 % ' 7 " V. 
Aged 44y¢:29rs, "   *
Wat  vmage.   
Pefiyapaena Talulc,
Myself «£);'1s'.:z_'ic¢,M   _ '  APPELLANT

 (By   Advocate for Cariappa as Co., Advs.)

4 _ "1- "{'.1;1<:n Director
'  State Industrial Investment

8s._Devé3opment Corporation Ltd.,

V' i Bhavan, 4th floor,
 V V T E',_a'stA?iing No.49, Race Course Road,
 _13anga;on=:-'sac 001.

  Karnataka State Industr1aI'

Invesimcnt 8:. Ejtrvebpment Corporataion Ltd.,
3"' finer, Sunday: Armada,
B.N.Roac1, Mysore

 



Represented by its

Asst. General Manager.  REs:é;fig-..:_:$i'.'P.No.18080/2005, wherein the
learned singxg afiaggdécafiéd to interfere with the action of the
  pmcccdings dairad 4.2.2900 under
2 Financial Oorporaticn Act, 1951. The

    Industrial Investaznciit and Devciopment

figizporatiozl 133., had initiated the said proceedings dated

"as the appellant-petitioner afier having seemed 1% in

 ~»Vt_}_;1ti'."3zéVa'§;t'  had mm to repay the moneys due and payable to

n " V V ' ' ~  At}ievVi§§'.pondcnt-Cexpoxation.

 



2. Learned counsel appearing for theiziwrfifis

parties have settled the issue and   

settlement

3. Pending disposal of   Swztitlemcnt pmrposed
by the appellant on 1. respondent.

Corporation on also acted upon
between the ‘f to record the above:
submission’; aPP¢337iH8 for the
appellant further orders are requirw in
the xnattczj. of aommigggy.

. . . . .

Chief Justice

Sd/-

JUDGE

‘ — i1id;:3i$’Yes/No. //’

‘Web Host: Y;€§fNO