High Court Karnataka High Court

The Managing Director vs Sri Kashinath S/O Bassayya … on 6 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Managing Director vs Sri Kashinath S/O Bassayya … on 6 June, 2008
Author: Deepak Verma Gowda
IN THE HIGH COURT 9:? KARIDIATAKA AT 
DATED THIS THE em DAY or JUN3;.2£§G;és9__'__;:"'..' " 
PRESENT  " 'V V '% 1'
THE I-i()H'BLE MR. JtIs'Ifit c": E 1:A3i§.;:P%Ai«;A
 ANu  .. . V .  .7
THE HOWBLE MR. JUS'fi§E  V
WRIT APPEAL 1v£5;'3é t;:%;VL'29o3 ""L;VTER;-}
BETWEEK:   4 V   %

The Ma.1i1_agj11g Dnéezctar,  _    v

Krishna Bh;3gf;.'_3_ Nigam  V' . 'V

FWD Ofiice An:nex§.%.iL¢;1%$X;m;g, 4.  ' 

15*' Floor,     _  _  '

BANGALORE -'i's§;:() org;  '. " V

Represe1:'£:s::£..b§};;its "§:.;  " .9  '

C~ompa;r_1}* Secftvtatfg.    ' .. APPELLANT.

{By 312:.MR'.ci'.';:2;;vv:;_:}&:1§..--;
AND:   , " ._ ' " 
Sri. Kgasmnam,  ._ " '

 v  S/41>': dfiiaagayjga 

Aggfiz ?v',Ia'j::é1', _UCq_C-N i1,

 F3} (5 T§1f;i1.f~:c':it/,  'Pg; Muddebiln-:11,
'§')._I__E§"_';'.': ;3ar,JA;=U;3.. .. RESPOHDEHT.

~k'_':?:__':1r_':h'_ir_'k_1¥__1\r

' Tfiis Writ Appeal is fileti ulldfil' Section 4 01" E116 Karnatalsia

 "High Couft Act, praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ
V. ~P§:fiIii.:3«}:1 P-E0.31'E'O['2€}f3i3 datfid 13. I}.2(}(}?.

Tiais Writ Appeal Coming on for Prefimhzary Heari11g this tlajg,

T  " "DEEPAK VERMA .1, deigivered the following:

1



J U 13 G M E N '1'
Heard Sri.M.R.C:.Ravi, learned ceunse} fer the appellant an

atimissiexz. Record perused.

2. This appeal is belied by 2'? clays. So fa1'..;iie *3'.-eeued

':0 the respencient. We etili ti"m11_g11t,_it fii.V1EeV"'1iF:e1'" 'tlfieV ieafnefif

ccaunsei for the appeilant on n:ze1*ité;,& Atzirziitiefiiy   113::-5" 5

been preferred against the  order '..§ZC'{3'7 passed
by the learned Siingie Judge in w':.:f: Peiiti9I:_.  has not been
disputed before us that 'e1i'bsAeq_u€2::b1t iG.fl1Le'eimpugned onder passed

by the learned Six: glee J11f1Vge.,i_ Wfit "'1.;:;:1sf been disposed of on

merits. *'TIi1u-5, 'Vi7E:::r éL'A_E"p1;aefica} geiifpose, irzterixn order has merged
in the fling} QI'CVif:"f.I'.V =i'i"he1efi3re; we fmci tllat no case is made om': to

entertain siieh an ap1§e.ra};'~.-- from the fact that it is barreci by

  iv}:  no merit. Accordingly appeal stands

    ..

Sd/-.
Judge-”
S&/…

Judge

‘* VAGV.