-7? ORDER
After the proceeding was remitted to th€VV’EI«1b~{§dd1.
Labour Court, Bangalore, by order (it.
W.P.No. 15409/ O5, AnneX.J, notieep _ was ‘r1.”o’t= to
petitionepworlnnan since a submissizzen was _rr1ade”‘bjf-the
learned counsel for the reé_p’Qr1der1″t~Corporation ..that tire’
workman was not ref_i.nstatedC:”was..r1’o–l.ongier Working
in the Corporation; the labour court
proceeded ._pas{§’VV’ 8/1/2010 in
Hence this writ
petitiorrbypplthe an.
2′; .__Learr1e_(l “for the responder1t–Corporation
is eandid in-» her submission that a Wrong submission
was before the labour court by the learned Counsel
for the Corporation, stating that the
xVo’1*km.t’ah’Was not reinstated and was not working in the
H Corporation, though factually the petitioner was serving
‘”‘the”Corporation pursuant to interim order of this court in
V’ WP. 15409/o5.
‘\.w.)
2
3, If that is so, the award of the
suffers from Violation of principles natural juet£e’e.’antl’_
therefore calls for interference.
4. In the result, write’petition_”lS allo*,:?eadF_
dt. 8/1/2010, Annex.K, the in Adar.
Labour Court, Bangalore, anldl’the”V4proeeeding
remitted for consideration-V–.wiin of the order cit.
16/7/2009 bass an award in
after extending reasonable
accordance ” 1
opport1;ni’ty_ of hearing . t1<1.eVpaf'rties concerned.
Parties 'are:_:'rep~r_esented by learned Counsel and
thereforellare d1',reotve<l "lo be present before the III Addl.
V, __ Court' on"~~l'8/6/20 l 1, without further notice.