High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sia Devi @ Seema Devi & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 15 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sia Devi @ Seema Devi & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 15 October, 2011
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.28406 of 2011
                       1. Sia Devi @ Seema Devi W/o Kishori Yadav
                       2. Mantu Kumar Yadav @ Santosh Kumar S/o Kishori Yadav
                                                 Versus
                                         The State Of Bihar
                                               -----------

3. 15.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

Petitioner no.2 seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Sections 302 and 379 of the Indian Penal

Code.

Considering that apart from suspicion on account

of earlier litigation between the parties the accused persons

have been implicated, let the petitioner no.2 above named be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the

satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in

connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.65 of 2011, subject to

the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative

of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as

to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about any

change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
-2-

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed

for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )