High Court Kerala High Court

M.P. Sebastian vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 16 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
M.P. Sebastian vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 16 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 20053 of 2009(B)


1. M.P. SEBASTIAN,S/O. PAILEY,AGED 72 YRS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,NJARAKKAL
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NJARAKKAL

3. CONVENOR, SAHAKARANA SAMRAKSHANA MUNNANI

4. RETURNING OFFICER/SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,

5. KARTHEDOM RURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :16/07/2009

 O R D E R
               P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ.

                     -------------------------------

                      W.P.(C) No.20053 of 2009

                     -------------------------------

                    Dated this the 16th July, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

Raman, J.

Petitioner is the present President of the Karthedom

Rural Co-operative Society Ltd., 5th respondent herein. Election

to the managing committee of the 5th respondent Society is

scheduled to be held on 19.7.2009. The petitioner apprehends

that unless police protection is ordered, there is likelyhood of the

election being disrupted.

2. We have gone through the averments made in

the writ petition. Since an election is to be held to a Co-operative

Society, it is the duty of the State to see that such election is

conducted in a peaceful manner, without being interrupted by

anybody.

W.P.(C) No.20053/2009

2

3. In the circumstances, we direct respondents 1

and 2 to give necessary protection for the smooth conduct of the

election for Board of Directors of Karthedom Rural Co-operative

Society Ltd., scheduled to be held on 19.7.2009.

4. The petitioner may produce a copy of this

judgment before respondents 1 and 2 for information and

compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE

P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE.

nj.