IN THE HIGH COURT OF
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA._H_ -- , I
DA'l'EI")'1'I~EIS THE 20m DAY OF sEPI'EMI2I§§R.;jV'2.£)"i0- H
BEFORE'
THE H0N'131.I3: MR. JUS'FICI§._AJ,l;l' J.
WRIT PETITION No.83--2$--7 OF 2019
BETWEEN: L 'V
MALLAPPA
s/0 SIDDAPPA PUJARI" --
AGE: 25 Y}:~:ARs'~..,, V »
OCC: NIL 4 j .
R/O KACIIIEAPUR
TQ.JEWARAG'i--- --. ~
DIST"
PETETIONER
{By SMT; .__UI'»IADI:'.VI~»s--.£3'.".*-AIIV., )
ANII * » _
A 1. "21?-I'"I': P'REsIDI::\I*f'
" ~ .. V SELECTiON COMMITTEE
C:?f'sECCRi:TY GUARD. BMTC
-A 'w'}-iEfxI§3'--Oi%??I4'}'CI:?, m-I. ROAD
S}*iA3\_IT§ NAGAR
" IBANGALORIE.
I 2. = 4_ 'rI~IE BLOCK ISDUCA'i'ION OFFICER
. _ EVVARAGI
H DIST. GULBARGA.
' ""3. KOIDIGOUDA I\':If).
4. NAG/XRAJ/\
V " Sharma Mallikz-M-j1.11'1z-1. I'--ZCGP is diFt'('.i('.Ci to take
";:1{)'iit.?e for resp()n(ie11E No.2.
L.)
5. SH'ARA'F§"i KU MAR RR.
6. JAG-ADISH BK.
'I'HI*3 RESPON DEI\E'1" NO. 3 TO 6
ARE R/O 8: C / O T F1133 P'RI3SII)EN'I'
SECLECTION COMM!'i'TEE OF; ._
SECURITY GUARD. BMTC.
HIEAD OFFECIB. K.H. ROAD
SHANTI NAG}-\R
BANGALORE. V
,_';--v%4L:{1*2sPoND.Em'S=
(Bysn:VEEREsHI3;m¢u"ADVfl]F6R}u
Sn:sHARmuxMALuKAR;UN,HcQP FQRIcy
TTHS VLPIEHLE§ §mQjE$&A5ajCLgS 226 &;227 or
'nH;C0Nsn%UޤNBsUEzxwRH'
OF iWANDAAfifii.fHRECTEK§ ink: RESPONDENT 'K)
CONSHJER.j}Hf§REPREsENTATkn¢ DATED en 122009
;nLEh£n~nfi§b§mTxflfi§1ide1’it’. had come out with a i1otiiie’:tt’.’i’c)ii
dated 20″‘ Febrtiziiy 2009 mid (.’.&iii€?Ci ‘c1p._’.~’_)”}:i'(“£’a’tfjitiliih” V’
seieetiori of vaczlnt. post. of “Gra_r_ie~ zzirijci oi’ se,oLi1″i’ty V
guards. The petitioner also rnétkes’_”*aLh ita.pj3lieat:io’i’x~_tent
18.3.2009 for the post of se°e_;i;–rity thee
application of the petitioner is ‘TBS-}v)'{}r1(_j:E€3l1′{ N083
to 6 are selected. Aggi’ie*t.red_ bythe;siii?i'”$’e’ie(ttiion process. the
petitioner is before t.his.CevLu}t. V
I ha1\{.e”h’ti;tI5ti_,.the ].ezi_r;i;.ed -igioéjuisel for the petitioner and
The faiseci by the learned Counsel
for the p”et_4it1one’r. weightage is not given to the
pet;it3;§one*r. Another contention raised is that the rejection of
. the _ap_1_)1ieai:io{ion the g1’oui’1d that BDO sigmittires is not t.o
“beT-:mi£1d”_~;=;:o;fé;:i:. She also further subniits that the
pet.i’tiori.er “hes given 21 representation. :1 copy of which is
, pr:)_dt.1(.’e”d zitt A:11’i(?xt.:rc%wN for reeo1’1sider2’1t’ion oi’ the
pe’tit:ionex~’s claim.
1 have perused the i)E1¥)Cr$t
3. Appé-iI'(3I’1f.i_\;’. the second reliefwhich is s(;>L1g;’iV1te’,_iiy.t%ie
petiiicmer for qiiashing of the app0im1’11ei’1i. 0i’;”i”e’S1;Qi’idei’iii
N0s..3 to 6 does not. arise. But. hcixvever. 2: d’ifC(f'{iI)1i’ifC1,1}€.1 ibe
issued to the first respondent to
ofthe petitioner at Annexxirefifi_eiai.ee§..3;i.;,i2.§§–flQJi, . ‘ .. –
4. i”‘Ie1″1.ce. the following
A directicm respondem to
Consider the re_qvt1esi .VV–afr_ ‘Lat AnneXure-N
expedit icnlsiy ‘ f1(7::’-5? i:2:1 \’V: V’ ”
permitted. to file his
m.emo7of appearaencéei ew1’thain._ {cuff weeks.
Sri,’Mgiiililsréirjuiizi, HCGP is permitted to file
* v. &_ hi.é_s”‘r?1er1__1’c; of a.})p’i2a1.r_e1m:e within four weeks.
1;”
7:13;’
R mu/–