Soni Tulasi Ram vs G Saroja on 19 November, 2008

in THE HIGH comsrr or xanzwmxa cxncurr 3m;mf;i-; -  " 

AT DHARWAD

Dated this the 19th day of Noircxygibmj,  , .. 1: 

BEFORE % . &
mm norrnm ma. mmcg  
Writ l3..f  CARa1qikag:'ath

T S;'o.Chi1ma Satyanarayana Sctty
  Rfio D.No.164, Ward No.13
" Dist. Kunmczl
.. ' Andhra Pradcsh

 



Court Lgzadct the Ibllgwing:

 ": .«._O1*dcr  on I.A.No.7 by the tzrial Court rejecting his
 'iqo fik: statement of objections to the main final decree

 ____'pit>¢§:cdings. ¥'\/"

3 Chimri Eshwaramxna

W/0 C Vcnkatappa Sctty

Major

R/o No.18'?   
Ward No.16 I
Hospet

4 Chinni Satyanarayana Set_:t'y._V
S/o late Venkappa Sctty  "
RIO No.1S'7, 153* Ward     
Hospct   *  '*.._...Rcspdn;dcnts

(By Sri Y. Lakshmikant Raddy, .Adxfnx;m_.for R1;

SriP G MQgli,_ Advocate for R46,'
' .: 'Rcsppndent-Sédelctcd) 

This  Pétifioii  articles 226 and 227 of
the Consfitéufiéaé ''of*-I'{1_.j1c_Im,_ ' quash impuged order
Annczaxrjeéb datcéri 139312.-'£2306 in FDP No.1/2000 passed by
Additional City VCit'.£i~-.,Judge__(Sr.3311.), at Hospct and allow IA
This Writ Pei:i1jon'«._cd1*hing on for orders this day, the

onnzn

 

 'If__1V:1c  has challenged in this writ petition the



2. The petitioner claims right in  _

schedule to the petition under the  ::iaeed~ .. 

18.01.2002

executed by his bmthee c1¢f¢n;1a;;t:9-

suit. The petitioners brother is pumhaee:*:. e

defendant of his half shame. pefifienerxy-3ac§;z:1ued’ his

alleged mg’ ht in the duiiiig’ nt’l:}eV ‘Vj;ze1’1denevjr°of; the Final

request as he the final decree

proceedings. , iii” the”-éjnatter; there is no merit in

this Writ pe1;;:i5.a,: it alisvziiismissed.

Sdié.

Fudge

V . “Espl-