High Court Kerala High Court

T.S.Velusamy vs State Of Kerala Rep. By The on 21 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
T.S.Velusamy vs State Of Kerala Rep. By The on 21 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36406 of 2009(U)


1. T.S.VELUSAMY, AGED 52 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION,

3. SECRETARY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :21/12/2009

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                 -------------------------
                 W.P.(C.) No.36406 of 2009 (U)
            ---------------------------------
           Dated, this the 21st day of December, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the Government Pleader

appearing for the 1st respondent and the respective standing

counsel appearing for respondents 2 & 3.

2. The petitioner’s grievance is against Ext.P6.

3. The petitioner is an Executive Engineer now working

under the 2nd respondent Corporation. According to the petitioner,

he was posted under the 2nd respondent Corporation only by order

GO(Rt.) No.2001/09/LSGD dated 06/08/2009 and that immediately

thereafter, by Ext.P6 order dated 29/10/2009, he has been

transferred and posted to the 3rd respondent Municipality. He has

sought cancellation of Ext.P6 by filing Ext.P8 before the 1st

respondent, and orders are not passed on the representation.

4. As at present, the petitioner has not been relieved from

the 2nd respondent Corporation. Having regard to the above and

also the complaint of the petitioner about the frequent transfers to

WP(C) No.36406/2009
-2-

which he is subjected to, I direct the 1st respondent to consider

Ext.P8. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within eight weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

5. It is directed that in the meanwhile status quo as on

date, in so far as Ext.P6 transferring the petitioner, shall be

maintained.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along

with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for

compliance.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg